Why are there three or four angles of the random ICE killing today and only one or two of the Charlie Kirk assassination four months ago (with thousands in attendance)?
Why are there three or four angles of the random ICE killing today and only one or two of the Charlie Kirk assassination four months ago (with thousands in attendance)?
SS: Charlie Kirk’s assassination has been somewhat forgotten on this thread. We only saw from his front and one angle of his front. Meanwhile in less than 24 hours we have three or more angles of a random guy getting killed by ICE. What gives?
spamitizer on
Because everyone was recording ICE, including the man they murdered.
Legal_Ant_8900 on
People are recording in case they or someone else gets shot.
I don’t think anyone expected someone to get shot when Charlie did. At least not the american people in attendance..
LegalizeDiamorphine on
I still think he’s alive & it was an elaborate hoax pulled off with some prosthetics & a blood squib.
Probably meant to incite violence & divide people. Which it did, but not quite to the extent that they wanted.
So now they’re just killing regular citizens (left-leaning ones to be exact) to try & get a reaction that way.
Too many inconsistencies & weird things with CK’s case. Like the fact that the crime scene got treated like a stage production being taken down & then bulldozed over with cement. The whole “bones of steel” to the obviously fake “trans activist” texts, etc..
Or maybe they really did kill him & still hoped it would incite violence & division by making it look like the “left/dems” did it. But the blood that came out was still quite weird. Looked coagulated already & at one point you can see it just bounces off his shirt without leaving a stain. I grew up in the era of Rotten dot com & Ogrish, so it’s not like I’ve never seen real death before. But something about his didn’t sit quite right with me.
Even down to the timing of the question asked & the weird coincidences with the Snake Eyes movie & the WWE “memorial” that basically felt like watching an authoritarian government rant while selling merch & everything else is just too much. I think even the people who supported CK see the inconsistencies, but they’ll never go as far as believing he faked it for ulterior motives. because then they’d have to admit to themselves that maybe this person they liked wasn’t the greatest guy after all.
Sir_George on
Apples to oranges…
xXxPlasterXxX on
It was a staged psyop filmed by Hollywood just like the planes flying into the twin towers, the attempted hit on trump and recent shootings in Minnesota
LocalNHBoy on
Because one fits a narrative and the other doesn’t in today’s media landscape
Dapper_Trainer950 on
I thought they had to sign a NDA or something or scrubbed off the internet.
fmfan23 on
Because the media controls the narrative and the level of outrage you’re supposed to have. The Charlie Kirk killing was filmed in HD, they recorded all of his events, but they’d never release that footage, obviously.
Plenty_Attorney1772 on
Wasn’t there some sort of government aircraft tracked circling above the event? Someone said it was an airplane known for electronic espionage or something and i remember hearing people say they had issues recording or using their phones during the event.
TopShelfBreakaway on
I’ve still yet to listen to one of his podcasts.
CalligraphyWest on
Good point, with hundreds of cameras on him and there was NO CELL PHONE FOOTAGE of the shooting
SlySychoGamer on
Because have you notice where its happening?
It’s in hyper progressive areas who literally think they are fighting hitler nazi troops.
They are hyper vigilant
Nkosi868 on
The CK crowd was filled with his supporters, yet none of them uploaded their evidence.
I’m guessing that they couldn’t care less what happened to him. He was just a pawn and easily replaceable as we are currently seeing. Trump literally bypassed a question about CK the day after he was killed, so he could fawn over his “ballroom.”
browning099 on
Same reason they paved over the area where he was the next day.
Overall_Age8730 on
Because the assassination of Kirk was fake.
DRKMSTR on
Because one situation had tons of cameras, the other didn’t.
Turns out when peacefully asking questions and answering them, both sides don’t see the need for more cameras.
JaktoPar on
Because nothing was happening in the first place for people to film CK from different angles. While in ICE case it was an ongoing event.
Mochalada on
Charlie was unexpectedly assassinated by a pro sniper at an event that most people expected to see uploaded to YouTube within the week. Alex was murdered at a protest where everybody is recording at all times and knew if they didn’t immediately upload their footage it would be confiscated.
19 Comments
SS: Charlie Kirk’s assassination has been somewhat forgotten on this thread. We only saw from his front and one angle of his front. Meanwhile in less than 24 hours we have three or more angles of a random guy getting killed by ICE. What gives?
Because everyone was recording ICE, including the man they murdered.
People are recording in case they or someone else gets shot.
I don’t think anyone expected someone to get shot when Charlie did. At least not the american people in attendance..
I still think he’s alive & it was an elaborate hoax pulled off with some prosthetics & a blood squib.
Probably meant to incite violence & divide people. Which it did, but not quite to the extent that they wanted.
So now they’re just killing regular citizens (left-leaning ones to be exact) to try & get a reaction that way.
Too many inconsistencies & weird things with CK’s case. Like the fact that the crime scene got treated like a stage production being taken down & then bulldozed over with cement. The whole “bones of steel” to the obviously fake “trans activist” texts, etc..
Or maybe they really did kill him & still hoped it would incite violence & division by making it look like the “left/dems” did it. But the blood that came out was still quite weird. Looked coagulated already & at one point you can see it just bounces off his shirt without leaving a stain. I grew up in the era of Rotten dot com & Ogrish, so it’s not like I’ve never seen real death before. But something about his didn’t sit quite right with me.
Even down to the timing of the question asked & the weird coincidences with the Snake Eyes movie & the WWE “memorial” that basically felt like watching an authoritarian government rant while selling merch & everything else is just too much. I think even the people who supported CK see the inconsistencies, but they’ll never go as far as believing he faked it for ulterior motives. because then they’d have to admit to themselves that maybe this person they liked wasn’t the greatest guy after all.
Apples to oranges…
It was a staged psyop filmed by Hollywood just like the planes flying into the twin towers, the attempted hit on trump and recent shootings in Minnesota
Because one fits a narrative and the other doesn’t in today’s media landscape
I thought they had to sign a NDA or something or scrubbed off the internet.
Because the media controls the narrative and the level of outrage you’re supposed to have. The Charlie Kirk killing was filmed in HD, they recorded all of his events, but they’d never release that footage, obviously.
Wasn’t there some sort of government aircraft tracked circling above the event? Someone said it was an airplane known for electronic espionage or something and i remember hearing people say they had issues recording or using their phones during the event.
I’ve still yet to listen to one of his podcasts.
Good point, with hundreds of cameras on him and there was NO CELL PHONE FOOTAGE of the shooting
Because have you notice where its happening?
It’s in hyper progressive areas who literally think they are fighting hitler nazi troops.
They are hyper vigilant
The CK crowd was filled with his supporters, yet none of them uploaded their evidence.
I’m guessing that they couldn’t care less what happened to him. He was just a pawn and easily replaceable as we are currently seeing. Trump literally bypassed a question about CK the day after he was killed, so he could fawn over his “ballroom.”
Same reason they paved over the area where he was the next day.
Because the assassination of Kirk was fake.
Because one situation had tons of cameras, the other didn’t.
Turns out when peacefully asking questions and answering them, both sides don’t see the need for more cameras.
Because nothing was happening in the first place for people to film CK from different angles. While in ICE case it was an ongoing event.
Charlie was unexpectedly assassinated by a pro sniper at an event that most people expected to see uploaded to YouTube within the week. Alex was murdered at a protest where everybody is recording at all times and knew if they didn’t immediately upload their footage it would be confiscated.