I am in agreement about the language requirement and the ways in which is does disadvantage traditionally underrepresented groups.
But that’s not up to the provinces to dictate do we have no one that’s taken a constitutional law course?
Eurolib0908 on
Submission statement:
This situation highlights the fundamental tension between the liberal principle of institutional independence and the rise of populist governance. Premier Smith’s attempt to use provincial funding to influence judicial appointments challenges the separation of powers, a cornerstone of stable governance that protects property rights and contract enforcement, which are key ingredients for healthy markets. By framing the issue through the lens of ‘Western alienation’ and attacking bilingual requirements, the conflict underscores how identity politics can destabilise the technocratic institutions necessary for economic efficiency.
Readers should consider the risks of politicising the judiciary, since subverting judicial independence can undermine investor confidence and the rule of law. The debate also offers an example of federalism in action: while provinces seek greater autonomy, centralising influence over the Supreme Court could fragment Canada’s unified legal market. Finally, Smith’s use of the notwithstanding clause and funding threats shows the growing trend of populist leaders to prioritise the will of the majority over institutional safeguards, raising concerns about the resilience of liberal democratic norms in economic policy.
datums on
Lol, she chose the worst possible time to pick a constitutional fight with the federal government.
3 Comments
I am in agreement about the language requirement and the ways in which is does disadvantage traditionally underrepresented groups.
But that’s not up to the provinces to dictate do we have no one that’s taken a constitutional law course?
Submission statement:
This situation highlights the fundamental tension between the liberal principle of institutional independence and the rise of populist governance. Premier Smith’s attempt to use provincial funding to influence judicial appointments challenges the separation of powers, a cornerstone of stable governance that protects property rights and contract enforcement, which are key ingredients for healthy markets. By framing the issue through the lens of ‘Western alienation’ and attacking bilingual requirements, the conflict underscores how identity politics can destabilise the technocratic institutions necessary for economic efficiency.
Readers should consider the risks of politicising the judiciary, since subverting judicial independence can undermine investor confidence and the rule of law. The debate also offers an example of federalism in action: while provinces seek greater autonomy, centralising influence over the Supreme Court could fragment Canada’s unified legal market. Finally, Smith’s use of the notwithstanding clause and funding threats shows the growing trend of populist leaders to prioritise the will of the majority over institutional safeguards, raising concerns about the resilience of liberal democratic norms in economic policy.
Lol, she chose the worst possible time to pick a constitutional fight with the federal government.
Have at it Danielle.