Title says it all.

Was trying to get Google to list all the confirmed redactions that were messed up. Google reminded me of the scrutiny of the releases for having unredacted victim info. I had heard about license info and social security stuff but I did NOT hear anything about the underage photos of nude women.

Fucking disgusting.

Be aware.

This is fucked.

How are we supposed to analyze the files directly if the government hid literal child p*RN in the releases.

Am I crazy?

Is this a honeypot?

Thank GOD I didn't download that video dump someone posted earlier. I went to the GitHub. Looked at ol boys username. It's a brand new account. Felt sus. Wouldn't have downloaded it anyways but that def shied me away as well.

This is nuts to me…every. single. Person.

Reporter. Citizen. Whoever that downloads the entire file dump effectively becomes a trafficker of illegal underage pornography. Wtf?

Posted by Inevitable-Moose-952

12 Comments

  1. Inevitable-Moose-952 on

    Share this. I’ll delete my fucking account if someone thinks this is for karma. 

    Copy paste it actually. 

    Take credit for the discovery. Idgaf

    Just don’t let the community of people who actually give a shit about this be silenced by some bogus ass shit like this. 

  2. Inevitable-Moose-952 on

    Please fuck upvote this.

    Also, apparently you’re breaking the law if you try to subvert redactions as well. All kinds of shit can be used there. Driver’s license social security ALL kinds of shit in there. Someone downloads it. Boom. Instant batch of evidence. There’s even fucking disclaimers within the DOJ that talks about shit like this. 

    I’m scared for the journalists who immediately batch downloaded files. 

    No need to frame people with CP when they willingly downloaded it themselves. 

  3. ObviousSinger6217 on

    Appreciate the warning good sir, I believe you are probably right that it’s all a trap

    I never needed the Epstein files to know who or what the elite are, it’s all in the Bible

    Read Ezekiel, or the four gospels if you want to know what I’m talking about

    God bless

  4. Acceptable_Art_448 on

    If the government was stupid enough to release CSAM on the DOJ website, can we sue the shit out of them?

  5. Aggressive_Chair1470 on

    probably just incompetence but I do agree they’ll potentially use it to prosecute people 

  6. 404media co made a podcast about this they took them all out already I don’t think this is the case anymore.

  7. I think everyone accessing the DOJ and clicking “YES” would already suspect their IP is being logged. Of course it is. EVERYTHING is tracked and traced. But this especially.

    It’s certainly viable to set unsuspecting people up like you’ve suggested. Alphabet agencies will put CSAM on any device regardless, if they want to frame, arrest or disappear someone. Still, practice OP SEC like always, as futile as it may seem.

    No doubt, identifying, data mining and keeping a record of anyone that engages with it. In a pending surveillance state, knowing who the most inquisitive captives are is always going to be relevant.

  8. DataExternal4451 on

    Tbh if they did try do something, you would win the case with a half decent lawyer. They literally made the files available to download.

  9. Gemini is wrong. We have been digging through every picture for a week now. No evidence of this claim exists.

    /thread

  10. Quick_Director_8191 on

    I went through a lot of the .PDF to MP4 and they were all redacted. Why is this being pushed so hard?

Leave A Reply