Ottawa has started to make payments for key components for 14 additional U.S.-built F-35s, even as the Carney government has been reviewing future fighter-jet purchases in the context of trade tensions with Washington, sources have told CBC News. 

The money for these 14 aircraft is in addition to the contract for a first order of 16 F-35s, which will start being delivered to the Canadian Armed Forces at the end of the year.

According to sources, the new expenses are related to the purchase of so-called “long-lead items,” which are parts that must be ordered well in advance of the delivery of a fully assembled aircraft.

Canada had to make these expenditures to maintain its place in the long-term delivery schedule and avoid being replaced by other buyers in the queue, sources said.

CBC News agreed to provide confidentiality to sources who were not authorized to publicly comment on the F-35 purchase.

The fact that Ottawa has started paying for long-lead items for 14 additional fighter jets has not been made public.

In response to questions from CBC News, the Department of National Defence refused to confirm that new funds have been committed for new F-35s, saying the review of the proposed purchase is "still underway."

The review was initiated by the Carney government last year in response to annexation threats and tariffs imposed by the Trump administration against the Canadian steel, aluminum and automotive industries.

At the end of January, Defence minister David McGuinty also used the review to avoid questions on Ottawa’s plans to replace the CF-18 fleet.

“We have acquired 16 F-35 fighter jets,” he said on Jan. 28. “The question of further acquisition of that fleet remains under review.”

The Department of National Defence reported at the end of 2025 that it spent an extra $476 million on the CF-18 replacement program, but it wasn’t clear whether any funding was earmarked for additional fighter jets.

The Department of National Defence declined to provide a full breakdown of these expenditures.

The government has several options regarding fighter jets. It could simply continue with its plan to purchase a total of 88 F-35s in the long term.

It could also opt for a mixed fleet, composed of F-35s and another European fighter jet, such as the Swedish-built Gripen.

Ottawa is evaluating a proposal by Swedish manufacturer Saab to assemble those aircraft in Canada, which would create thousands of jobs as the government seeks to use military spending to revitalize the country’s industrial base.

In this case, the government might reduce its total F-35 order, a decision that would likely create additional tensions with Washington.

For now, one expert says Prime Minister Mark Carney appears to be using Canada's possible purchase of the F-35s as a key card in trade and diplomatic negotiations with U.S. President Donald Trump.

"Each week, Trump adds another reason not to move forward with the F-35 and he is the one creating a negative spiral. This puts the Carney administration in a difficult position," said political scientist and defence specialist Justin Massie.

According to Massie, who is a professor at Université du Québec à Montréal, expenses related to the purchase of 14 additional F-35s are to be expected given Ottawa has not officially changed its F-35 policy, despite the ongoing review.

"The longer the decision is delayed, the harder it will be to back down," he said. "Because once you've made financial commitments and signed contracts for the next batch, it's always more complicated to go back."

Jody Thomas, a former deputy minister of national defence, told CBC News the payments for 14 additional F-35s are the proper way to handle the file.

“In the absence of a decision on the fate of the F-35, this planning is crucial to ensuring that Canada has a CF-18 replacement," said the former national security advisor to the Trudeau government. "It is, in short, prudent and responsible."

Posted by IHateTrains123

6 Comments

  1. ScrawnyCheeath on

    This isn’t very surprising

    Even those who don’t want the F-35s concede that we’re talking about a mixed fleet, not exclusively Gripens

  2. IHateTrains123 on

    So far the government has discreetly paid for additional “long-lead” components, which are parts ordered in advance of a fully assembled aircraft, for 14 additional F-35’s. The first 16 F-35’s are expected to be delivered to the CAF by the end of the year. So far there have been no changes to Canada’s F-35 policy, although that might possibly change in the future.

    Last week the Ottawa Citizen reported that [Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy](https://ottawacitizen.com/public-service/defence-watch/defence-industrial-strategy-canada) will be published this week. Current military procurement has attracted criticism from [Canadian defence companies and experts](https://thewalrus.ca/carneys-buy-canadian-policy-doesnt-require-companies-to-be-canadian/) for continually allowing American companies to participate in these programs, despite promises to “Buy Canadian.” Yet for F-35’s there might be a change, as the National Post reported that a source claims that Canada was looking for a [mixed fleet of F-35’s and Grippens](https://archive.fo/YxFRu).

    It is also possible that, as the article alludes, further procurement of F-35’s will be used as a negotiation tactic in the upcoming CUSMA review. Evidence of this is in [Anand’s refusal to sign any critical minerals deal with the U.S., instead rolling it into the upcoming CUSMA negotiations](https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-us-critical-minerals-bloc-usmca-anand/).

    Further reading:

    [Procurements / Projects – Canadian Defence Review](https://canadiandefencereview.com/procurements-projects/)

    [The Golden Dome is where Canada’s F-35 debate and Trump’s Greenland threat meet | CBC News](https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/f35-greenland-canada-missile-defence-9.7069059)

    Other news:

    [German minister says auto industry in talks to expand footprint in Canada – The Globe and Mail](https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-german-minister-says-auto-industry-in-talks-to-expand-footprint-in/)

    [Autopsy of Canadian in ICE custody indicates his death was preventable, experts say – The Globe and Mail](https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-johnny-noviello-ice-custody-death-preventable-autopsy-experts/)

    [National Newswatch | Carney leaves Wednesday for Munich Security Conference](https://nationalnewswatch.com/2026/02/10/carney-leaves-wednesday-for-munich-security-conference)

    [National Newswatch | Conservatives to propose changing the rules for non-citizens convicted of crimes](https://nationalnewswatch.com/2026/02/10/conservatives-to-propose-changing-the-rules-for-non-citizens-convicted-of-crimes)

    [Ottawa commits $84M to install more than 8,000 EV chargers | CBC News](https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/national-charging-infrastructure-strategy-9.7081772)

    [Canada’s military ombudsman flags decade-long failure to fix reservist compensation system | CBC News](https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/military-reserves-health-ombudsman-inequities-9.7081485)

    [Trump threatens to block opening of new bridge between Windsor and Detroit | CBC News](https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/trump-gordie-howe-bridge-9.7081924)

    [Ottawa records more than 2,600 cases of employee misconduct](https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/article/federal-employees-terminated-suspended-in-more-than-2600-cases-of-misconduct-and-wrongdoing/) – CTV

    !ping Can

  3. TybrosionMohito on

    To me the logic is obvious:

    Either

    A: the US does eventually actually turn enemy to Canada and it doesn’t matter what fighter jet in small numbers they have

    B: the US does not and returns to… let’s say stability, and Canada would much prefer to have an actual credible 5th gen fighter fleet as opposed to Swedish copium

    Either way, buying Gripens over F-35s is cutting off your nose to spite your face, but I do get why Canada/Canadians would act out over it given what massive dick bags the Trump administration is being to them.

    (Also there IS something to be said for trying to get high end aviation back in Canada and apparently that’s part of the hypothetical Gripen deal.)

  4. >Canada had to make these expenditures to maintain its place in the long-term delivery schedule and avoid being replaced by other buyers in the queue, sources said.

    I don’t think we can read very much into this, they’re simply maintaining the status quo. It’s probably unreasonable to expect any decisions on this from the Canadian government right now, they are very obviously planning to use it as a bargaining chip in the upcoming CUSMA negotiations.

  5. If anything this is an indication that they’re moving toward a mixed fleet, which was what everyone was expecting.

Leave A Reply