Just screened tonight, Candace Owens tries putting 2 + 2 together about her recently recovered memory of visiting Tucker Carlson in Maine, a couple of months or so before Charlie Kirk's murder.
Erika Cries…Again. A Mysterious Death In Pennsylvania Reignites Butler Conspiracies
Candace recently told us she had completely forgotten about a day's visit with her husband to Tucker's place.
It was her husband who first reminded her recently Charlie & Erika had just left & Tucker told them he was impressed Erika was really "hardcore" on Israel – seeing Israel for what it truly is & acting appropriately, strongly in response.
Candace now tries to put 2 + 2 together – absolutely reasonably (actually you can't ignore it I think) to form this idea, this question.
We see now – now that Charlie the husband has been well & truly dispatched with in a gruesome, public ritual (and I strongly believe a threat to all) – we see just how incredibly close to Israel Erika really is. Indeed Candace reminds us Erika went from this purported anti-Israel attitude, which was very clear to Tucker, to telling us that questioning Israel is "just brain rot".
Erilka is doing all she can to taint the jury pool against Tyler Robinson in that ridiculous prosecution legend about her husband's assassination. At the one and same time she utterly demands nobody investigates her husband's murder as it would, in her own words, "taint the jury pool"!!!!!
"Don't investigate. Don't overturn stones. Dont look for anything and close your eyes to msssive anomaly after massive anomaly after massive anomaly. Because my friend Kash Patel's 33 hour operation is the voice of God and the Bible condemns those who question God." (Erika is essentially saying.)
Nobody does that. It seems so clear to me nobody who truly cares about what really happened in their husband's public, gruesome, terrifying assassination could ever act like this.
it's just so far beyond bizarre. That is, unless there would be some hidden purpose behind it. Do most things happen for a reason – or am I wrong and does the world work by that just bizarreness accounts for decisions people make?!
So is this evidence? Is what Tucker tells us about Erika's attitude against Israel while she was with Charlie, the opposite of her later blind, super obedient support of Israel, evidence of what was going on?
Two faced Erika?
As Candace puts it – was Erika talking out of both sides of her mouth, one side to Charlie in support of taking to task Israel & the other side to the Israel lobby / Israel?
But then, was this more than that? Was it worse than simply stringing Charlie along while dancing to the Israel beat behind Charlie's back?
Was it more purposive than just keeping Charlie happy & going along with him?
Candace asks could it be Erika was actually pushing Charlie further and further into a stronger stance against Israel?
Just before Candace's podcast, the channel Daily Freddo with Kasia screened this video, below, which asks a new question.
Did people more behind the scenes in control of TPUSA or people in the Israel lobby (or both) try to have Charlie give up his control of Turning Point USA?
WAS CHARLIE KIRK PRESSURED TO STEP DOWN? THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING…
The intricacies of the question, why was Charlie Kirk taken out, can be many – and these may be crux questions themselves within what really was happening.
-Can it be that unknown people decided Charlie was a lost cause within what had become a vessel for Israel control of the US youth, a vessel intended to have immense importance in coming years – Turning Point USA?
-Could it be, as Kasia asks, they did what they could to persuade Charlie into giving up control of the company? (Possibly involving offers of vast amounts of money?)
-Could it be that when this didn't work, the unknown, faceless people decided not only to end Charlie's control of TPUSA by ending his life, but also to create a planned, ritual, public extermination of Charlie as a message of what happens if you do what Charlie was doing?
That could well, actually, involve the plan that Charlie should feel he was doing the right thing in his new, strong stance against Israel – and that he should "Go Max".
-Where and when did the term "Go Max" actually originate?
-Was it seeded to Charlie directly or indirectly by Charlie's incognito handler or handlers after certain decisions were made in a dark room?
Posted by Lcb500