Three watchdog groups asked a federal judge Monday to shut down Project Meridian, the Pentagon’s future-of-warfare study led by Elon Musk, Palmer Luckey and Newt Gingrich.

    Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Public Citizen and the Project On Government Oversight filed the case in federal court in Washington, naming the department, Hegseth and Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering Emil Michael.

    Their lawsuit claims Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth built an illegal advisory committee out of people positioned to profit from its advice.

    A Pentagon spokesperson told Military.com that it does not comment on pending legislation.

    President_Donald_Trump_receives_a_briefing
    President Donald Trump receives a briefing in a secure location.  (Shealeah Craighead via Wikimedia Commons)

    Their complaint says the panel violates the Federal Advisory Committee Act, a 1972 transparency law. It requires outside advisory groups to file a charter, announce meetings publicly, keep records available, and carry a membership that is, in the law’s words, “fairly balanced.” No court has ruled on any of it.

    All groups want the court to void the memo that created the panel, bar it from meeting or advising the department until it complies with the law, force the release of its records, and block the Pentagon from acting on any recommendations in the meantime.

    A Panel Born in a SCIF

    Hegseth commissioned Project Meridian in a Sept. 30 memo issued the day of his Quantico address to the military’s top officers.

    Invoking operations Midnight Hammer, Absolute Resolve and Epic Fury, the memo warns that advances in artificial intelligence, autonomy, directed energy, robotics and biotechnology “will profoundly alter the character of warfare.” It directs Emil Michael to commission the study “through a partner organization” and orders findings delivered by Jan. 28, 2027.

    It also tells the Joint Staff and every service to “be prepared to connect their future warfare efforts and research to Project Meridian.”

    9890328
    Anduril Founder Palmer Luckey traces his path from the Silicon Valley to national security. Luckey highlighted Anduril’s process of designing Fury and the Arsenal-1 factory using the supply chain and workforce currently available. (OSW/DVIDS)

    That partner organization is MITRE, the nonprofit research operator, whose experts will assess the technologies and produce a report expected to run up to 30 pages plus classified annexes.

    “The Department of War contracted with MITRE’s National Security Engineering Center FFRDC to conduct Project Meridian, an independent initiative on the future of warfare,” a MITRE spokesperson told Military.com. “The effort examines the technologies and operational concepts required to sustain U.S. military advantage across the full spectrum of future warfighting domains.

    “MITRE brings decades of experience working at the intersection of national security, technology, and the public interest. Its mission-immersed technical experts will apply deep understanding of war fighter needs, systems-level perspective, and rigorous, objective analysis to assess emerging technologies and their implications for future military operations.”

    The spokesperson added that outside parties, specifically mentioning the nation’s top business leaders, policy experts and technologists, who will meet regularly to inform the development of strategic recommendations for the department regarding Project Meridian.

    “Their insights will inform prioritization of future war fighting domains and emerging technologies, while identifying novel operational concepts for the battlefields of the next generation,” they added.

    The panel’s first gathering happened the day of the announcement, with Hegseth saying a meeting of “great Americans” and “a small group of us” was “happening in a SCIF,” the secure rooms used for classified discussions, such as by lawmakers debating war policy.

    A second meeting followed Oct. 1 and included Sens. Tom Cotton and Tim Sheehy, whom Hegseth asked to serve as representatives on the project, according to a Cotton social media post cited in the complaint.

    Neither meeting was announced or opened to the public, and no charter had been filed, the suit says.

    Nineteen of 21 From the Private Sector

    MITRE’s published roster lists three co-directors and 17 participants. The complaint counts 19 of the 21 people involved as private-sector figures, leaving Michael and Air Force Chief Scientist Victoria Coleman as the only government members.

    Musk leads SpaceX, which has secured more than $8 billion in defense contracts in 2026 alone, according to NPR’s review of government announcements. Luckey co-founded the autonomous weapons maker Anduril.

    Other participants include Oracle executive vice chair Safra Catz, Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale, Axon chief executive Rick Smith and executives or investors from Saronic, Hadrian, Agility Robotics, Stoke Space and a string of other defense and technology firms.

    The Pentagon's F-35 Joint Program Office confirms fighter jet parts were somehow diverted to Hong Kong, raising national security concerns. (FILE).
    The Pentagon’s F-35 Joint Program Office confirms fighter jet parts were somehow diverted to Hong Kong, raising national security concerns. (DoD photo by Master Sgt. Ken Hammond, U.S. Air Force, Wikimedia Commons)

    Those members hold financial interests in the same weapons and technologies the panel could recommend, the complaint alleges. It does not claim any member has steered a contract.

    Pentagon officials have not said whether Musk and Luckey serve as special government employees, a status that would place them under federal criminal conflict-of-interest law.

    Isabel Munilla, POGO’s interim executive director, said the government should not be outsourcing its vision for the future of warfare to “a panel dominated by individuals that stand to profit from it.”

    The Pentagon Was Warned First

    POGO put the department on notice before suing in an Oct. 29 letter to Hegseth, Michael, and the Pentagon’s advisory committee management officer.

    The group asked that William Hartung, a defense budget and arms industry expert, or another adviser be seated to balance the roster. They wrote that without fair balance it was “obligated to take legal action.”

    POGO sought an answer by Oct. 30, while the suit arrived four days after the letter with the seat still unfilled.

    AP26301250105879
    U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth leaves after attending the Association of Southeast Asian Nations’ Defense Ministers’ Meeting in Cebu, central Philippines, Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2026, (AP Photo/Aaron Favila, Pool)

    The complaint also argues the Pentagon never determined whether an existing committee could do the work, pointing to the department’s chartered Science, Technology and Innovation Board, which stood up this year under full advisory committee rules and covers overlapping ground.

    One Meridian participant, Lookout co-founder John Hering, already sits on that board, according to the complaint’s citations.

    The Pentagon’s Defense Already Exists

    A possible Pentagon answer to the concerns already predates the lawsuit. MITRE “is responsible for the analysis and recommendations” and will apply “appropriate conflict-of-interest and information safeguards,” a department spokesperson told NPR in October.

    MITRE has separately invited companies and individual experts to submit future-warfare ideas by Nov. 12, calling the effort “not a solicitation” that confers “no advantage” in any government competition.

    Federal courts have refereed this kind of fight before, in a case veterans may remember.

    In 2021, the D.C. Circuit revived a VoteVets lawsuit over the so-called Mar-a-Lago Council, three Trump associates who advised Department of Veterans Affairs leadership from Florida without any public process.

    A group with “an organized structure, a fixed membership, and a specific purpose” can fall under the advisory committee law, the appeals court held, whether the government brings it together “by formal or informal means.”

    Nothing in the new filing automatically pauses Project Meridian. The government’s response will come on the court’s standard clock while the panel’s Jan. 28 deadline keeps running.

    Even if the judge intervenes, the report Hegseth ordered may arrive before any ruling on whether the group that wrote it was legal.

    UPDATED 8:45 a.m. ET, 11/3/26: This story was updated with remarks from the Pentagon and MITRE.

    Comments are closed.