I want to preface this that just because refugees tend to be a net-cost on the host country, does not mean they are bad and shouldn't be outright compared to economic-migration programs. It is important for wealthy societies to provide protection and safety for the most unfortunate in the world to a certain capacity.
However, if we do want refugee programs to remain viable and popular, is there any way that they can become net-positive or at least net-neutral?
Integration programs tend to be very difficult as it can take multiple years to learn a language before you can viably seek employment. What do you think?
Posted by iBikeAndSwim