Surprise, surprise…. nothing to do with paying more taxes.
United-Attitude-7804 on
TLDR: the study concludes that it is the sea surface temperature that coincides with fluctuating CO2 emissions, no human impact was found, so efforts to mitigate human emissions are pointless…
So, the central claim of this paper is that by doing a hyper-naive statistical correlation they find that sea surface temperature explained approximately 66% of the variance in annual CO2. That they are getting the order of causation seems like a pretty obvious explanation. How one gets that this is anything what the headline or article claims is unclear to me.
Prize-Horse-8589 on
If we don’t have to have as many emissions, create less waste, and use less chemicals, aka a land ethic, it will make life more pleasant for all of us as we attempt to control mother nature.
mitchman1973 on
Let’s have an open, public debate on this. Time for the Alarmists to bring all their data for the world to see and decide if we need our billions back
RuportRedford on
This is already known. Remember, not one IPCC report ever came true. Thats right, billions in funding to the UN for Climate Research and 100% of every single study they produced ended up never coming true. Its a scam, and its obvious.
DudeManBro21 on
Shut up and buy our electric cars and stop eating meat
7 Comments
Surprise, surprise…. nothing to do with paying more taxes.
TLDR: the study concludes that it is the sea surface temperature that coincides with fluctuating CO2 emissions, no human impact was found, so efforts to mitigate human emissions are pointless…
For anyone that wants to read the entire [study](https://scienceofclimatechange.org/wp-content/uploads/SCC-Ato-Multivariate-Analysis-Vol.4.2.pdf)
So, the central claim of this paper is that by doing a hyper-naive statistical correlation they find that sea surface temperature explained approximately 66% of the variance in annual CO2. That they are getting the order of causation seems like a pretty obvious explanation. How one gets that this is anything what the headline or article claims is unclear to me.
If we don’t have to have as many emissions, create less waste, and use less chemicals, aka a land ethic, it will make life more pleasant for all of us as we attempt to control mother nature.
Let’s have an open, public debate on this. Time for the Alarmists to bring all their data for the world to see and decide if we need our billions back
This is already known. Remember, not one IPCC report ever came true. Thats right, billions in funding to the UN for Climate Research and 100% of every single study they produced ended up never coming true. Its a scam, and its obvious.
Shut up and buy our electric cars and stop eating meat