The theory of the colossal trees is one that I thoroughly enjoy.
I sit on the fence with regards to the possibility – I have seen some very interesting evidence, but there are many naysayers and I can’t dismiss the geologists out of hand. Nonetheless I choose to believe it, if only to make life more interesting, and I am always looking for additional evidence as to the truth of it. Naturally, I felt obliged to incorporate giant trees into the narrative of my own mythological writings.
These are pictures from the opening pages of a book I own called ‘*Mountains of Southern Africa*’. They are photos of the places in the Swartberg (‘Black Mountain’) range, which I myself have traveled through once upon a time, many years ago (before I’d ever heard of the ‘giant tree’ theory). The formations are astounding either way.
I find it interesting that the consonant roots of the word ‘*berg*’ (mountain/hill) is cognate with ‘*bark*’ (of a tree). Noting that ‘G’ is the voiced form of ‘K’, and these two letters are largely interchangeable. Also, one traditionally uses wood to build a ‘*barque*’ (ie. boat). The word ‘ark’ (root ‘RK’) is cognate with ‘rock’ (‘RK’).
Also, as per the thread title, the word ‘tree’ (root ‘TR’) is cognate with ‘tor’ (meaning ‘hill/sharp rock outcrop’).
—
In gematria…
* *”Can you see the Wood?”* = 1,**911** latin-agrippa
* … ( *”Revelation”* = **1010** latin-agrippa ) ( *”Tree Stump”* = **1010** english-extended )
1 Comment
(Not a) Sub-Mission State-Mind
The theory of the colossal trees is one that I thoroughly enjoy.
I sit on the fence with regards to the possibility – I have seen some very interesting evidence, but there are many naysayers and I can’t dismiss the geologists out of hand. Nonetheless I choose to believe it, if only to make life more interesting, and I am always looking for additional evidence as to the truth of it. Naturally, I felt obliged to incorporate giant trees into the narrative of my own mythological writings.
These are pictures from the opening pages of a book I own called ‘*Mountains of Southern Africa*’. They are photos of the places in the Swartberg (‘Black Mountain’) range, which I myself have traveled through once upon a time, many years ago (before I’d ever heard of the ‘giant tree’ theory). The formations are astounding either way.
I find it interesting that the consonant roots of the word ‘*berg*’ (mountain/hill) is cognate with ‘*bark*’ (of a tree). Noting that ‘G’ is the voiced form of ‘K’, and these two letters are largely interchangeable. Also, one traditionally uses wood to build a ‘*barque*’ (ie. boat). The word ‘ark’ (root ‘RK’) is cognate with ‘rock’ (‘RK’).
Also, as per the thread title, the word ‘tree’ (root ‘TR’) is cognate with ‘tor’ (meaning ‘hill/sharp rock outcrop’).
—
In gematria…
* *”Can you see the Wood?”* = 1,**911** latin-agrippa
* … ( *”Revelation”* = **1010** latin-agrippa ) ( *”Tree Stump”* = **1010** english-extended )
—
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gR1EHUgNnNE
—
—
EDIT – 10 minutes later –
* *”The Instant Downvoting of the Truth?”* = **1337** primes
* … ( *”The Agenda”* = **777** squares ) ( *”To Hide the Truth”* = **777** latin-agrippa )
Again, I’m making no specific claim one way or the others, but the pattern of reactions is interesting (and sad).
—
* *”When the Great Trees fell”* = 1,**911** trigonal
* … ( *”The Toppling Tower”* = 1,**911** trigonal )
* … ( *”The Toppling Tower”* = 1,**911** trigonal )
* … ( *”The Toppling Tower”* = 1,**911** trigonal )