>But on current evidence, and with a few more years of demographic churn, it is plausible that an electoral plurality will vote Labour on a rejoin basis.
Decades, not years
The Boomers will be here until 2040
upthetruth1 on
>But there must be a limit to how many unpopular ideas a movement can stockpile before suffering electorally.
They are, the problem is the electoral system
If we had PR-STV, Left/Liberals could transfer among themselves
In Australia where they have Compulsory AV, PHON have been rising yet Labor’s 2PP and seat projections keep increasing because PHON (like Reform) is a Boomer party.
According_Music_8570 on
At what point do you admit the term Populism was never a very descriptive term and just drags down any discussion it’s a part of
3 Comments
>But on current evidence, and with a few more years of demographic churn, it is plausible that an electoral plurality will vote Labour on a rejoin basis.
Decades, not years
The Boomers will be here until 2040
>But there must be a limit to how many unpopular ideas a movement can stockpile before suffering electorally.
They are, the problem is the electoral system
If we had PR-STV, Left/Liberals could transfer among themselves
In Australia where they have Compulsory AV, PHON have been rising yet Labor’s 2PP and seat projections keep increasing because PHON (like Reform) is a Boomer party.
At what point do you admit the term Populism was never a very descriptive term and just drags down any discussion it’s a part of