The Worse moon landing defense I have heard yet 🤦(Evidence the moon-landing was faked PART 15)

In NASA’s own official video, we hear from one of their own members one of most the dumbest defenses for the moon landing from NASA, or any Apollo rabbid for that matter. Basically, the kid’s summing up an explanation for why we haven’t gone back to the moon, and by extension why any space travel beyond low orbit is under wraps…

“We dismantled the manufacturing lines for Apollo technology because the program ended and it was obsolete. We lack the ability to produce the technology today, as rebuilding those manufacturing lines is a waste of time and money”

This insinuates our access or the state of the exact technology we used for an older feat somehow affects our ability for a new & different feat. This is madness. After world war 2, many manufacturing & production facilities for the rifles, planes, and other equipment built in that era were similarly shutdown/repurposed. 

Did that mean we stopped making guns and planes because the exact same manufacturing lines from world war 2? Nope. Many new versions of technology following the war were improved techniques demanding different production means than the older models, so they were built on completely new manufacturing lines. Never once has our ability to keep having bigger & better weapons after the Nazi regime been swayed from destroying or decommissioning the means to make or use older technology. 

The Wright Brothers: Their plane was practically tiny, and meager, and not built to fly around the entire world. Did it take over 50 years for us to finally get a giant airplane that could carry cars because the exact manufacturing means (the wright brothers themselves as their plane was hand built) and a plane being way bigger and for a different purpose than the wright plane just being too much of a time gap? Nope. Within 40 years, aircraft getting progressively bigger & better than the Wright’s plane was built with completely different and new manufacturing lines, factories, and industry level production! New innovation and ideas based off the wright brothers’ core principles for the plane, it was never a hassle to replicate the exact down to atom details of the very same gears and wires of the wright aircraft!  Hoover Dan was the largest dam on earth in the 30s. Within the next 40 years the closest we may have gotten to using the same “production means” as Hoover was the glen canyon dam (it’s at best a copycat in design) but within the next 40 years hundreds of Dams were built over Hoover, several being much larger. Fort Peck Dam was larger than volume, and this was less than a single decade after Hoover. The Three Gorges Dam, the largest dam on the planet faced significant hurdles in its production. But guess what? None of them were based off lacking exact production means or technology for the Hoover dam. Three gorges  having a different purpose and circumstances than Hoover wasn’t much of a concern as it could be—as many dams within 40 years following Hoover had steadily been advancing shortly after Hoover, and to this day. Every piece of commercial skyscraper, car, submarine, or advancement in tech from 40 years earlier doesn’t only have a superior equivalent today, but stuff better than the original was built shortly beyond the quality/capabilities of the original within that timespan. The Apollo missions blatantly make themselves the only exception to that principle, yet people are happy to believe anything relating to human pride/or achievement, even if it’s bogus. As for the excuse “it’s for science!” I’m not convinced as jarrah white and many other hoax supporters whose books you can find on Amazon, as well as the Apollo detectives openly state they loved Apollo as much as the next American until they got very deep into science—and from the perspective of an Apollo Rabbid, if a hoax supporter claims to have disproved one of your peers points about Apollo being real, you’ve seen people you trust demonstrate why they think Apollo could be real so thoroughly you have a pre-set conclusion that the disproving you just saw from a hoax supporter is false, and go find stuff you think successfully supports that idea. Likewise, everyone should flip the logic onto my side and maybe then understand why hearing hoax supporters have been “disproved” isn’t very concerning to me, and some of the hoax supporters I mentioned are giving rebuttals to the false debunkings apollo Rabbids have claimed to this day (not that I expect this to mean anything to the Apollo rabbids). “The Apollo technology is obsolete and we won’t be making it anymore” Given how aggressive corporate media is to defend mainstream lies, I find it baffling they’d use such a logically illiterate explanation that collapses under such simple scrutiny, Jesus of Angola.

And even if the moon landing was real and I was NASA’s CEO, I’d never list the obsoleteness or loss of Apollo technology as a reason we can’t return. In fact I wouldn’t list anything as a reason we COULDN’T return—because if it was real I’d happily be announcing we’e going to mars 40 years after Apollo, without those 40 years going way beyond a simple landing on the moon🙄 you can Blame Elon Musk all you want🤷 The idea people say God is far fetched while believing Apollo could be real will never be short of astonishing for me.