Boomer Esiason Suggests Barring California from Hosting Super Bowl

Posted by According-Activity87

3 Comments

  1. According-Activity87 on

    >So, in the case of Darnold, he made $178,000 from winning the Super Bowl. However, because he spent the week in California and the state factored the tax based on his salary, not on what he made from the Super Bowl, he had to pay a whopping $249,000 in taxes

    ![gif](giphy|j3x5hjUoXIesM)

  2. >work your ass off all year to fight for us like gladiators
    >then earn negative money after taxes

    Refusing to do business with California would be a perfectly sensible decision.

    It’s nothing personal, it’s *we’ll hire someone else for that role.* CaliforniaState is the job candidate that says he has *A Degree* without specifying what subject, then goes straight to spelling out how he expects more compensation than your entire department is getting.

    If he somehow gets the job, he goes straight to complaining which turns into threatening legal action which turns into suing. Working with him turns into going through hell with him, which is why you don’t want to work with him, which is why he sues all the time.

  3. Archduke_Of_Beer on

    To be fair, and open air, daylit Superbowl just feels unwholesome to begin with

    Whole game felt like a bad 1 o’clock game in October

Leave A Reply