
The United States would “strenuously oppose” European countries such as Poland, Germany or the Scandinavian states seeking to develop their own nuclear weapons, says a senior Pentagon official.
However, Elbridge Colby, the under secretary of defence for policy, also noted that Washington has not seen credible signs that such countries are seriously considering building their own nuclear arsenals.
His comments came amid growing debate in Europe about nuclear deterrence. This week, Poland confirmed that it is in talks with France over President Emmanuel Macron’s idea of extending the French “nuclear umbrella” across the continent.
The following day, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk even appeared to hint that Poland could in future seek its own independent nuclear deterrent.
“Poland takes nuclear security very seriously,” he said at a cabinet meeting. “We will cooperate with our allies, including France, and as our own autonomous capabilities increase, we will also strive to prepare Poland for the most autonomous actions possible in this matter in the future.”
Last year, Tusk also said that it may be better for Poland to develop its own nuclear capabilities rather than rely on those of others. “It is clear that we would be safer if we had our own nuclear arsenal,” said the prime minister. “If we decide to do it, it is worth being sure that it is in our hands and we make the decisions.”
On Wednesday, Colby spoke about the issue at an event hosted by the Council on Foreign Relations, a think tank. He noted that he has not “heard credible reporting of European governments really thinking about independent acquisition in violation of their nuclear nonproliferation treaty obligations”.
But he added that “a greater European complexion to NATO nuclear deterrence” would be “perfectly appropriate and reasonable”.
Colby pointed to the fact that the UK and France – the only two European nuclear-armed powers in NATO – have been contributing “to the deterrence and defence of the alliance” for the past 50 years.
But the US official also expressed scepticism about the idea of France expanding its nuclear umbrella, noting that “the French nuclear deterrent is designed for the defence of France”.
“It is one thing to change declaratory policy; it is another to have a credible nuclear deterrent that you can extend to countries that are hundreds of miles away”.
An audience member later asked Colby to clarify his position, saying, “If the German government, the Polish government, and/or Scandinavian countries were to come to you and say, ‘We want to develop our own nuclear capabilities,’ would you try to talk them out of it, or would you encourage them?”
“I think we’d more than try to talk them out of it,” Colby said. “We’d obviously at a minimum strenuously oppose it…It’s hypothetical, but we’re against such an eventuality.”
The issue of nuclear deterrence in Poland has also become caught up in domestic politics, where Tusk’s more liberal, pro-EU government regularly clashes with conservative President Karol Nawrocki, who is aligned with the right-wing opposition and is an ally of Donald Trump.
Earlier this week, Nawrocki’s chief foreign-policy advisor claimed that the government had not informed the president, who is commander-in-chief of the armed forces, about the discussions with France on joining its nuclear deterrence programme.
He cast doubt on the viability of the idea and suggested that Poland would be better off seeking a nuclear sharing arrangement with the United States. Last month, Nawrocki himself also expressed his strong support for Poland seeking a nuclear deterrent.
Responding to Colby’s remarks, presidential spokesman Rafał Leśkiewicz told Polsat News that “a single statement by a representative of the American administration does not prove anything”.
Leśkiewicz reiterated that “we want to develop our capabilities when it comes to possessing nuclear weapons” and that “we have very good relations with the United States, and I believe that we will continue to discuss these matters with our key ally in the field of security and defence”.
Meanwhile, foreign minister Radosław Sikorski called for cool heads in the nuclear debate. “I reiterate my appeal to politicians to stop grandstanding about nuclear weapons,” he wrote on social media in response to a report on Colby’s remarks.
Alicja Ptak is deputy editor-in-chief of Notes from Poland and a multimedia journalist. She has written for Clean Energy Wire and The Times, and she hosts her own podcast, The Warsaw Wire, on Poland’s economy and energy sector. She previously worked for Reuters.
Posted by BubsyFanboy
13 Comments
!ping POLAND&EUROPE
**1. Why is this relevant for** r/neoliberal **?**
This is relevant to Poland, USA, Germany, Scandinavia, NATO, nuclear arms, military affairs and diplomacy.
**2. What do you think people should discuss about it?**
I think people should talk about Europe’s nuclear armament capabilities, Poland’s potential in nuclear arms, USA’s opposition to it and the potential reasoning for both favour and opposition on Europe owning nuclear weapons.
**2a. What do you think of the issue at hand?**
At this point USA should hold no sway. You had one job – protect Europe – and you got cold feet. Now don’t cry that we’re looking elsewhere for help.
Nukes are expensive. NATO already has US nukes, UK nukes, and French nukes, and French nukes are in the EU. There isn’t need for additional nuclear capability and the funds would be better spent on conventional forces
Okay well then why do we keep teaching the lesson that nukes make you invincible and if you don’t have them we can invade and bomb you whenever we feel like it?
Well, if USA didn’t want European proliferation THEY SHOULDN’T HAVE THREATENED TO INVADE A EUROPEAN COUNTRY.
Holy fuck this admin is ridiculously incompetent. No one was talking seriously about European nukes until the trump admin decided they hated NATO. They are the entire reason why this is happening.
Trump admin: creates incentives
People follow incentives
Trump admin: No, why are you doing that?!
There really does need to be a multi-national non-proliferation agreement between all nuclear armed powers. I hope an administration in the future focuses on that from a foreign policy perspective. I’m unsure how the UK, France, Pakistan, India, Israel or other feels, but I believe New START generally failed in small part because the US wanted China in the next treaty.
This is certainly Trump’s fault, but geopolitical reality from the Ukraine War and the lack of cooperation that came from that between Russia and the US has caused the elimination of the international nuclear treaty system. While New START only ended this February, I believe we’re beginning to see the consequences of its expiration.
Poland can get the bomb in one of two ways.
1 -France could secretly provide several kilograms of plutonium and some warhead designs. Poland gets the bomb in 1–3 years
2 – Poland can try to build their own enrichment plants and reprocessing plants from scratch. Iran spent ~15 years developing centrifuge capability. Pakistan and India both took about 10 years each. For Poland, it would probably take 5–10 years.
They will probably try to do the second one but imagine France just selling fissile material to any friendly nation who wants to buy. Since having a nuke is priceless they can charge whatever they want.
Hmm, I truly do wonder why all these countries suddenly want nukes. Hmmm… 🤔
Lol. They should absolutely tell us to F off.
> dEfEnD yOuRsElVeS aLrEadY yOu mOoChErS!
> no not like that!
Its increasingly apparent that security guarantees from the US and Russia are unreliable at best so of course countries are going to consider the ultimate deterrent.
Any nuclear power is gonna oppose other nations getting nukes
We will not get nukes. Alas. Middle countries should at least normalize nuclear thresholdness and a credible threat of making a leap for it in short span of time. Nothing else will convince superpowers go stop fucking around.
Provide for your own defense, Russia isn’t our problem.
NO NOT LIKE THAT
“defend yourselves”
“No not like that, don’t build your own stuff”
“No don’t make nukes”
“Only buy American goods”
“Also you have to join us on our own expeditions in random countries”
“Also give us Greenland”
Wow what a deal