If you don’t pay for your own food and you don’t pay for your own medical bills then you can’t just eat garbage and get sick. If you want to eat garbage and get sick then you need to pay your own way.
FatBa on
They just want dignity in the shape of Bonbons and Snickerdoodles.
reaper527 on
it would be fitting if the end result was them being knocked off the program. imagine filing a lawsuit like this.
D_Ethan_Bones on
They want to co-opt Christianity but they also lash out at it on sight. Make up your minds, nutballs.
>One plaintiff said her daughter suffers from “avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder,” and the restrictions don’t allow her to buy the food that she can ingest.
This lawyer is shopping around for an activist judge, coke and candy are not medical necessities.
>Supporters of the new restrictions say that taxpayer funds should not be spent on snacks and other unhealthy foods, while critics say the restrictions are unfair to recipients and confusing.
*””Confusing””* -why do they always pretend humans have the brains of goldfish? MORE VEGETABLES FROM THE PRODUCE SECTION, LESS FACTORY-MADE SWEETS IN BRIGHTLY COLORED PACKAGING.
They put up EBT Welcome signs at McDonalds then they’re up in arms the moment we try to take those signs down.
Mundane-Broccoli1771 on
If they have the money to file a ridiculous lawsuit, they shouldn’t be on SNAP at all.
beedubbs on
So taxpayers should both fund the garbage that makes people unhealthy, only to turn around and pay for their healthcare as well? Insanity
6 Comments
If you don’t pay for your own food and you don’t pay for your own medical bills then you can’t just eat garbage and get sick. If you want to eat garbage and get sick then you need to pay your own way.
They just want dignity in the shape of Bonbons and Snickerdoodles.
it would be fitting if the end result was them being knocked off the program. imagine filing a lawsuit like this.
They want to co-opt Christianity but they also lash out at it on sight. Make up your minds, nutballs.
>One plaintiff said her daughter suffers from “avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder,” and the restrictions don’t allow her to buy the food that she can ingest.
This lawyer is shopping around for an activist judge, coke and candy are not medical necessities.
>Supporters of the new restrictions say that taxpayer funds should not be spent on snacks and other unhealthy foods, while critics say the restrictions are unfair to recipients and confusing.
*””Confusing””* -why do they always pretend humans have the brains of goldfish? MORE VEGETABLES FROM THE PRODUCE SECTION, LESS FACTORY-MADE SWEETS IN BRIGHTLY COLORED PACKAGING.
They put up EBT Welcome signs at McDonalds then they’re up in arms the moment we try to take those signs down.
If they have the money to file a ridiculous lawsuit, they shouldn’t be on SNAP at all.
So taxpayers should both fund the garbage that makes people unhealthy, only to turn around and pay for their healthcare as well? Insanity