Isn’t it obvious how staged this was?
Besides the Charlie Kirk assassination/psyop,
the amount of flaws in this incident has me questioning this specific photo. Somehow this infamous photograph is supposed to represent something. Can a professional photographer fill us in on how/what type of camera can catch a bullet in mid air, plus is it something you’d have to be ready to shoot in order to capture?
Also how come no one has really pointed out that the “bullet” doesn’t even match up in alignment to where his ear was supposedly “hit”.
Posted by Ok-Contribution-4880
5 Comments
What is that line lol
The best proof is in the intact ear, when an old man get injured like that it will always leave a nasty scar.
And the Economist taunted us with it, the “his triump” cover has his ear as the focus point of the picture.
I just wanna know wtf Baron Coleman found that scared him so much he stopped looking into it.
Weird how this doesn’t get the same play on here that other things do…..🤔
If it was legitimate he would never have shut up about cheating death.