So the EU plans to keep teens off social media by mandatory ID verification, unless it’s LGBTQ+ content? That’s an interesting interpretation of “child protection.”
So the EU plans to keep teens off social media by mandatory ID verification, unless it’s LGBTQ+ content? That’s an interesting interpretation of “child protection.”
Sexuality is 18+ content everywhere in the world independently from the form of sex. Why would any form of sexuality be declared an under 18 content? This decision by the EU court makes no sense.
Jiminy__Crickets on
Look how quickly they’re willing to demonstrate that it was never about ‘protecting the children’.
No_Medium_8796 on
Hmmmm fits a certain nation’s narrative to destabilize and cause more degeneracy
TeamDirtstar on
I know it would shock the hell out of your browser history, but “LGBTQ content” doesn’t just mean fucking.
4 Comments
Sexuality is 18+ content everywhere in the world independently from the form of sex. Why would any form of sexuality be declared an under 18 content? This decision by the EU court makes no sense.
Look how quickly they’re willing to demonstrate that it was never about ‘protecting the children’.
Hmmmm fits a certain nation’s narrative to destabilize and cause more degeneracy
I know it would shock the hell out of your browser history, but “LGBTQ content” doesn’t just mean fucking.