I found this post on FB in Ukrainian and have translated it with AI. Also found link to the book they are referencing: https://archive.org/details/the-serial-killer-against-god/page/14/mode/2up
Post itself:
The events in Washington on April 26, 2026, during the White House Correspondents' Dinner, have shocked the world. While the official investigation is only just beginning, analysts and readers of James Ressler’s resonant book “Serial Killer Against God” cannot ignore the eerie parallels between reality and the scenarios described in the book.
In Chapter 20, “Assassinations of Politicians,” the former FBI profiler puts forward the hypothesis of a “puzzle coding” technology. Today this can be considered as one of the possible versions of what happened during the dinner in Washington.
Thesis: Assassination as a result of manipulation?
In his book, James Ressler suggests that modern anti-cult organizations, such as the Russian RACIRS led by A. Dvorkin or the European FECRIS, may use psychological techniques to destabilize society. According to this analytical version, an assassination attempt on a high-profile leader may not be a random act, but the result of complex manipulation.
What is this hypothesis based on?
Creating the image of an enemy.
The book describes how, through the media, a target is gradually stripped of human traits over a long period, turning them into a “legitimate target” in the eyes of a potential perpetrator.
Using triggers.
Ressler suggests that psychologically unstable individuals can be “activated” by specific media messages.
Symbolism of place and time.
The choice of the gala dinner on April 26 is, according to supporters of this theory, ideal for creating maximum information shock.
Why is it worth considering this version?
The author of the book “Serial Killer Against God” points to possible connections between anti-cult lobbying and certain political groups — what he calls the “Diveyevo Brotherhood.” According to Ressler’s thesis, leaders of Trump’s level who defend democracy, sovereignty, and traditional institutions may be perceived by these structures as obstacles to their ideological influence.
It is important to emphasize: at this moment, the involvement of anti-cult organizations in the events of April 26 remains only a version and a subject of discussion. There is no direct evidence of their participation yet, and the investigation must check all possible options.
Call for vigilance
However, even as a theoretical model, “puzzle coding” deserves attention. Ressler warns: if a technology of psychological influence on perpetrators really exists, then any politician whose views do not fit a certain ideology may find themselves under threat.
Today’s events in Washington are not a reason for panic, but for deep analysis. We must ask ourselves: who benefits from destabilization? And are the so-called “expert councils on cults and sects,” which supposedly fight dissent, actually the screen behind which the architects of chaos hide?
YOUR THOUGHT?!
Posted by blatck