SS: Safe and effective $cience. While other distractions are happening, this monstrosity goes unpunished
davulzurna on
which studies? can you give links please
Personal_Extent_8562 on
Problem is these “studies”, if you read them, are never as reported. When they tell you every other week the old joke of “coffee is good for you” next week “it’s bad for you”. These “studies” are based on either samples in labs or statistics. Yes statistics have some value but it doesn’t account for ALL the other factors that they HAVEN’T accounted for yet. Drinking, smoking, meat eaters. There can be huge correlations they NEVER screened for that are the REAL link. So these “studies” if we look back through history where they ASSURED everyone, oh the scientists are so smart and then 15 years later “we were wrong”. Like wound healing. It was always clean and dry, then they discovered wet wound wrapping could be just as or more effective. The same “scientists” being “honest” are the same ethical people who tell you it was safe or that they stopped developing a viable cure because it wasn’t “cost effective”. These people might have got cancer anyway. Just because they happened to have the jab which 70% of people might have anyway isn’t statistical proof of anything.
nonelectron on
Yeah, I need to see the data on this
Ad1um on
Interesting, he’ll either be flagged as a grifter, admitted, or suicided.
No way the paradigm redefining shot has unforseen consequences.
brendhano on
lol k
flamboyantdebauchry on
***COVID-19 vaccines are not linked to a rise in cancer*** or more aggressive cancer.
stevenssssssssspo on
Not a cancer risk if you didn’t take it. Those who elected to follow the science should have waited until science was conducted to determine the long term health risk. For the elderly that had a high mortality rate for covid it was a godsend. For those healthy and the public bullied them into taking it good. Maybe this will be a lesson about peer pressure and making your own decisions.
9 Comments
SS: Safe and effective $cience. While other distractions are happening, this monstrosity goes unpunished
which studies? can you give links please
Problem is these “studies”, if you read them, are never as reported. When they tell you every other week the old joke of “coffee is good for you” next week “it’s bad for you”. These “studies” are based on either samples in labs or statistics. Yes statistics have some value but it doesn’t account for ALL the other factors that they HAVEN’T accounted for yet. Drinking, smoking, meat eaters. There can be huge correlations they NEVER screened for that are the REAL link. So these “studies” if we look back through history where they ASSURED everyone, oh the scientists are so smart and then 15 years later “we were wrong”. Like wound healing. It was always clean and dry, then they discovered wet wound wrapping could be just as or more effective. The same “scientists” being “honest” are the same ethical people who tell you it was safe or that they stopped developing a viable cure because it wasn’t “cost effective”. These people might have got cancer anyway. Just because they happened to have the jab which 70% of people might have anyway isn’t statistical proof of anything.
Yeah, I need to see the data on this
Interesting, he’ll either be flagged as a grifter, admitted, or suicided.
No way the paradigm redefining shot has unforseen consequences.
lol k
***COVID-19 vaccines are not linked to a rise in cancer*** or more aggressive cancer.
Not a cancer risk if you didn’t take it. Those who elected to follow the science should have waited until science was conducted to determine the long term health risk. For the elderly that had a high mortality rate for covid it was a godsend. For those healthy and the public bullied them into taking it good. Maybe this will be a lesson about peer pressure and making your own decisions.
and they will keep pushing them