I think we can all agree, in many ways this world was not what we thought it was growing up.
Honestly I had no idea that some of these things were going on. Who knew that there was a 'Luciferian conspiracy' or social agendas where strings were being pulled to further some of these narratives.
To be fair, I also don't believe this is just a physical thing. I'm now beyond convinced this is also spiritual.
I'm sure many people reading this would agree with that conclusion – if you dig into events to a certain point it becomes more and more obvious.
Why else would there be worship of ancient gods and statues at Bohemian grove? Why would they do all of these half time shows, concerts and music videos, like the terrible recent one with Ariana Grande called 'petal'.
Its got to the point now that it couldn't be more blatant.
In my research, it comes down to this: there is a spiritual war at play. And I hope by sharing this it will help to alert to this. But also avoid the new age psyop that is being offered as a counterfeit solution.
New age religion also part of the trap. Problem reaction solution. Hooking you right back into their own Luciferian belief system.
Controlled opposition 'truthers' push the new age as another way of referring to a new world luciferian order. I've found the bible 100% explains all of this – but they've tried to make us avoid reading it by constantly saying its false.
Posted by DifferentMethod9618
2 Comments
Even the war against god is probably a ruse. I’ve heard freemasons going above the 33rd degree have a choice whether they want to go light or dark.
This guy thinks god and satan are aliens and i think on this level of reality that might be the truth [https://www.theorionlines.com/](https://www.theorionlines.com/) But there’s more to reality than a stupid game being played by aliens in one universe.
I’m going to do something you probably don’t get much of in this sub: take your premise seriously, and then not flinch at where it goes.
Twelve years. Fine. Let’s grant a lot of it.
Let’s say elite coordination is real — some of it demonstrably is, that’s not even controversial anymore, it’s court records.
Let’s even grant that the symbolic vocabulary is deliberate, that people near the top genuinely like the aesthetics of the morning star.
**So what if it** ***is*** **a Luciferian agenda? Why not?**
“Lucifer” is not a person in the Hebrew Bible.
It’s a Latin word. Isaiah 14:12 is a taunt-song aimed at the king of Babylon — *helel ben shachar*, “shining one, son of dawn” — a Canaanite astral image about the morning star that climbs high and gets swallowed by the sun.
Jerome rendered *helel* as *lucifer* in the Vulgate, because *lucifer* is simply what Latin called the morning star.
A common noun became a proper name, and a proper name grew a biography.
Origen and Tertullian welded it to Luke 10:18 and the character was finished.
The satan is no better off.
In Job he isn’t God’s enemy, he’s God’s prosecutor — a functionary in the divine council, on the payroll, who needs written authorization for every move he makes.
And you can watch the job description change between two books of your own Bible. In 2 Samuel 24:1 it is YHWH himself who incites David to the census. Three centuries later the Chronicler rewrites the identical scene: “Satan stood up against Israel, and incited David to number Israel” (1 Chr 21:1).
If you know Gérald Messadié – French author, he makes this the spine of his *Histoire générale du Diable.*
The adversary-*god* arrives with the Persians — Ahriman, Angra Mainyu, the Mazdean dualism the Judeans met in and after the Exile — and matures in the intertestamental literature, where Qumran hands you the sons of light against the sons of darkness in exactly those words.
The “spiritual war” you believe you found running underneath history is itself a product of history.
Norman Cohn spent a career on the shape you’re using. Here is his description of it, from *The Pursuit of the Millennium*: “The world is dominated by an evil, tyrannous power of boundless destructiveness — a power moreover which is imagined not as simply human but as demonic.” The elect recognize it; the tyranny grows unbearable; then comes the purification.
Every element of your post is in that sentence.
What changes is the name in the blank: Jews, lepers, Cathars, witches, Freemasons, Bolsheviks, globalists.
The blank itself never changes.
And notice the direction of travel. Secret nocturnal rites, inverted worship, harm to children, hatred of the human race — the Romans said all of that about Christians first.
Tacitus convicts them of *odium humani generis*.
Christians then said it about heretics, then about women who knew plants.
Messadié’s line on this is hard to improve: *qui croit au Diable en est un* — whoever believes in the Devil is one.
Not as an insult. As a description of what the accusation does to whoever makes it.
Now look at the video’s own bibliography. Robison, *Proofs of a Conspiracy*, 1797.
An Edinburgh physics professor, panicking at the Revolution, who decided the Bavarian Illuminati had done it. The Illuminati were a few hundred men, and they had been banned by the Elector of Bavaria in 1784–85 — four years *before* the Bastille.
Robison’s own Edinburgh colleague John Playfair wrote that the alarm of the Revolution had produced in him “a degree of credulity which was not natural to him.” Robison and Barruel are the two founding texts of the genre, and the line running from Barruel to the *Protocols of the Elders of Zion* is one of the best-documented genealogies in modern history.
You are not citing a suppressed source. You are citing the first draft.
You call it a false religion of reason and illumination. I’d just delete “false.” That’s what the Enlightenment was, that’s what the word says, and given the menu available in 1750 I’ll take habeas corpus and vaccination over the alternative.
A quick aside first, because it matters: a Taco Bell ad in which grey conformity is a prison you escape from is not a gnostic catechism.
It’s a company trying to take breakfast market share off McDonald’s. The demiurge in that commercial is the Egg McMuffin.
The empirical part of your research may well be right. Elites do coordinate. Epstein’s flight logs exist. Foundations draft legislation. Regulatory capture is measurable. Those are documented, prosecutable, deeply boring political facts — they have bank accounts, LLCs, jurisdictions, limitation periods, and beneficial-ownership registries.
The instant you call it a *spiritual* war, none of it is actionable.
Demons can’t be subpoenaed.
A conspiracy of the flesh can be audited; a conspiracy of the spirit can only be prayed about. It demands everything of your attention and nothing whatsoever of anyone’s balance sheet.
Adorno called occultism “the metaphysic of dunces,” which is rude, but his argument isn’t: the spooks appear exactly where real social forces have become too opaque to think about. The enchantment is *produced by* the opacity of power. And then it protects it.
So — and I don’t mean this as an insult to twelve years of work — who benefited from you spending those twelve years fighting Lucifer instead of reading a corporate registry?
You applied total corrosive doubt to everything. Media, medicine, governments, the New Age, “controlled opposition truthers,” the lot. Then you stopped at exactly one place and declared it exempt from the method that got you there.
That isn’t where an inquiry ends. That’s just where one stops.
Keep the twelve years. Keep the suspicion — it’s the good part. Drop the demonology. The world really isn’t what you were told growing up, but the reason isn’t that it’s haunted. It’s that it’s owned. And ownership, unlike possession, can be documented, taxed, litigated and undone.
And if that makes me Luciferian, fine. Light-bearer. Promethean. People do carry the lamp, it’s honest work and it helps society progress.