This is a repost after my account was messed with and my posts wiped. Clearly I must be on target to have them remove all of my posts (some of them with 13k upvotes).
——-
- I've done data analysis professionally on data sets much larger and more complicated than what we have been given. They are trying to make what we've been given seem like much much more than it actually is. It's really not a crazy amount of data at all. When people say we've gotten 3.5 of 6 million total files, or whatever the number that's floating around is, I don't believe that is anywhere near what the actual numbers are. They have presented the data in very strange ways, such as making each response in an email chain a separate .pdf file. This massively inflates the numbers and gives a deceptive idea of how much we are getting. I would bet that we are getting a very small fraction of what is available. I would not trust official file counts in any way, because they are counting things in a completely nonsensical manner. What we have gotten is just a tiny sliver of what they have in totality.
- We aren't even getting messages from Epstein's most important account, which he used every day for his operations. (His MindSpring address.) This account would hold messages discussing details of what was going on at his properties. It would likely reveal details about who was at his properties, including girls. This is the most important email address we need data from, and we have next to nothing from it.
You can find more detail on his MindSpring account and links to relevant documents here:
We need to demand the messages from Epstein's MindSpring account. If they don't already have them, they need to avail us of what extreme lengths they have gone to in attempts to retrieve them, and what they are still doing. I'm willing to bet that they already have them, and that they contain matters considered sensitive to national security.
Why is the DoJ ignoring,and potentially intentionally redacting, Epstein and Maxwell’s most important email addresses?
I’ve been looking into some email addresses that both Epstein's staff and Virginia Giuffre had mentioned being used in Epstein’s operation.
Those email addresses are the following:
[[GNMM@earthlink.net](mailto:GNMM@earthlink.net)](mailto:[GNMM@earthlink.net](mailto:GNMM@earthlink.net))
[[gmax1@mindspring.com](mailto:gmax1@mindspring.com)](mailto:[gmax1@mindspring.com](mailto:gmax1@mindspring.com))
[[jepstein@earthlink.net](mailto:jepstein@earthlink.net)](mailto:[jepstein@earthlink.net](mailto:jepstein@earthlink.net))
[[jeffreye@mindspring.com](mailto:jeffreye@mindspring.com)](mailto:[jeffreye@mindspring.com](mailto:jeffreye@mindspring.com))
It seems Epstein’s primary contact pre 2011 or so, and the email he used for his everyday operations, was his MindSpring email, and at some point that may have become an EarthLink email since the two companies merged under EarthLink in the early 2000s. Epstein also owns or owned \\\~1million in EarthLink bonds, whatever that amounts to. There are also payments to EarthLink in Epstein and Maxwell’s credit card records spanning from 2005-2016.
According to his staff and multiple documents, Epstein and Maxwell’s MindSpring/EarthLink accounts were central to the operation and used every day for communication. These accounts also had extra security measures around them, as they used remote access software known as Citrix to manage them. Citrix is software that the US Government also uses to control classified information.
The Mindspring network was described as "a server" that Epstein/Maxwell used "to communicate with employees". Testimony indicates it was "a message system between him, the houses, the employees, his friends" set up by Mark Lumber and Tim Newcombe
In Maxwell’s case vs Giuffre, Maxwell tried to claim her MindSpring and EarthLink accounts were either unused or just spam accounts. She failed to produce any messages from these accounts in her court case vs Giuffre.
During Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal trial with the FBI, FBI analyst Sean Flatley testified that all emails he reviewed from Government Exhibit 54 were from the [[gmax1@mindspring.com](mailto:gmax1@mindspring.com)](mailto:[gmax1@mindspring.com](mailto:gmax1@mindspring.com)) account, indicating this was a primary account for evidence collection.
What I find most troubling is that the DoJ seems to be redacting instances where Maxwell’s MindSpring address (and possibly Epstein’s) shows up in the Epstein files. For example here, where you can see her address is redacted but you can see the routing information which lists MindSpring servers:
Here you can see an example where they redacted her email in one place but missed it in the quoted message, which tells me maybe they told an AI to redact all mentions of her MindSpring address but it missed some. This happens in multiple instances:
Here you will find a handwritten investigative note on page 7 detailing Epstein and Maxwell’s MindSpring addresses as “important” along with having a Citrix programmer listed:
Here you will find a Deutsche Bank report detailing Epstein’s email addresses (doesn’t list his gmail address):
Here is the only email chain I found displaying Epstein’s MindSpring or EarthLink address being used:
Here is another document showing Epstein’s primary contact as his MindSpring address:
Here’s a document listing email addresses for Epstein where one address is blacked out for some reason:
An email detailing staff describing Epstein’s use of MindSpring for everyday communication:
A document detailing the Giuffre case and Maxwell’s boldfaced lies about her MindSpring and EarthLink accounts:
[https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/EFTA02788488.pdf](https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/EFTA02788488.pdf)/EFTA02788488.pdf%5D(https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%2520Records/v.%2520Maxwell,%2520No.%2520115-cv-07433%2520(S.D.N.Y.%25202015)/EFTA02788488.pdf))
Why hasn’t the DoJ produced all of the messages from these accounts, and why do they seem to be redacting instances where these accounts show up? Why does it seem the DoJ is helping to draw attention away from accounts that were likely far more important to Esptein’s operation than what we’re being given?
Something tells me these accounts may be a gold mine, as they were the primary accounts used during his peak years of operation before he began receiving public scrutiny.
Posted by TrueOdontoceti
1 Comment
Maybe this time it won’t be removed.