Believe it or not, not living in a surveillance state ruled by ethically dubious tech lords is a bipartisan movement. People don't like spy cameras, and crowdfunding for legal fees for the individuals(heroes of the republic) who did damage to said cameras has often been successful. The median voter can actually be based, it turns out.
Posted by AccomplishedQuit4801
4 Comments
I don’t celebrate vigilantism and vandalism because I believe having respect for the law is important for society.
I do think these cameras are a stain on society and should absolutely be banned, though.
https://preview.redd.it/xqa0gc1d10mh1.png?width=834&format=png&auto=webp&s=126b59a75cd03dc0945186f2da8daeea3d6cffde
BRB starting the first American Chapter of the ‘Blade Runners’
NGL, this might be one of the rare cases where vandalism in protest is actually unbelievably based. Hopefully this resistance will continue to the point where Flock is more or less dismantled, either by governments wanting to keep constituents happy or by the citizenry on both sides of the political divide embracing the ideals of the Boston Tea Party.
If folks want to crowdfund the legal fees of vandals who destroy these things, who is anyone to tell them no? There’s nothing illegal about it and it sends a pretty precise message to planners who include such cameras on their budget.