In 2011, Swedish treasure hunters from Ocean X were scanning the Baltic Sea for shipwrecks when they found something completely unexpected around 90 meters below the surface.
Sonar showed a roughly 60-meter-wide about 200-foot circular formation on the seabed.
Behind it was a long disturbed section of seafloor that looked almost like the object had been dragged or deposited there.
The image immediately went viral.
People called it a crashed UFO, a secret WWII installation, Atlantis, and just about everything else imaginable.
But the part I find more interesting came later.
When Ocean X returned to investigate, crew members claimed their equipment repeatedly malfunctioned close to the anomaly.
ROV video feeds reportedly went out.
Sonar signals disappeared.
A compass allegedly began behaving erratically.
They even claimed electronics aboard the surface vessel experienced problems while directly above the location.
Obviously, underwater equipment fails.
That alone proves nothing.
But the crew claimed these failures happened repeatedly around the same specific area.
Eventually divers reached the anomaly and described flat surfaces, straight-looking edges, step-like formations, a circular opening and other features that looked unusually geometric.
They also recovered physical samples.
The samples were rock including basaltic or volcanic material.
That strongly supports a geological explanation.
Geologists have suggested that glaciers transported and deposited the material during the Ice Age, while sonar distortion made the formation appear much more artificial than it really is.
That's entirely plausible.
But here's what bothers me.
More recent multibeam sonar scans released by Dennis Åsberg have been interpreted by Ocean X as showing the main formation sitting on top of sediment rather than being part of the underlying bedrock.
If that's correct, something deposited it there.
Again, glaciers can absolutely move enormous masses of rock.
But after more than a decade of UFO stories, geological arguments, alleged equipment interference and increasingly detailed scans, why has there still not been a properly funded independent expedition capable of producing a definitive 3D map, geological survey and sediment analysis?
This doesn't require believing in aliens.
In fact, the most likely explanation may still be completely natural.
But this seems like exactly the kind of case where a relatively straightforward scientific expedition could either kill the mystery permanently or reveal that something genuinely unusual is happening.
Instead, almost everything we know still comes from the same small group that discovered it.
I put together the discovery, the dives, the equipment claims, the recovered samples, the skeptical explanation and the newer scans.
What interests me isn't really “is this an alien spacecraft?”
It's why, after 15 years of arguments, nobody independent has gone down there with modern equipment and conclusively settled it.
Posted by No_Money_9404
1 Comment
The answer is short: the interest of the media was way bigger than the interest from science. Its pretty much clear that it is only rock – an usual formation – but still, natural rock.
How to find money for an exploration when every sign of that site screams “natural formation”?