Now i’ll be the first to admit, i am not a genius or an expert in law. Nor am i an expert in phyops. So i do not have great verbiage or explanation on why i think this but ill try my best without using AI. For generations (in my opinion) the government has done a fantastic job at dividing us by race and gender. It seems like every year, a case or situation gets blown up just to make us argue and resent each-other. Movies and media since after WW2 have blown up single parenthood or divorcing couples. Movies and shows such as “The awful truth” (1930s) and “The production code” (1934-1954) which would glorify the acceptance of divorcing your spouse. Not to mention the CIA was created shortly after WW2.
Now i would really like to just stick to the theory here and not get into the case itself. this is a fun conspiracy and not a riot. This is also not a man vs women debate, this is a debate on how the government may of divided us. (they have done exceptionally well)
What other cases can you think of that was blown up to divide the people?
Posted by 69ingAnnunaki
2 Comments
All it’s really doing is pointing out how much women’s opinions are consensus based and not based on reason
I think they’d like it to be a man vs woman issue.
What threw me into psyop land was the song. Some melodramatic call to arms for tired mothers who believe the workload is unfairly balanced.
The point of the song is kind of “patriarchy, this is all your fault”
Which confuses me… cuz I thought the antipsychotic meds were the issue….
So in that vein I could see this not being a total psyop but the “man vs woman” narrative feels contrived by big pharma as a way to push the heat off of them by trying to frame the whole case as a societal issue, and not a medication-blaming one.