It is not very well known that during about a roughly 15-20 second window immediately following the collapse of the north tower on 9/11 there remained a portion of the building that still briefly stood before seemingly turning into dust.
What is most interesting about this structure is the very long vertical object which extends up unsupported for several hundred feet into the air, something which is often called the "north tower spire."
According to the official collapse narrative, both towers fell from what was essentially a domino effect of the floors and debris from the higher levels falling down and building up momentum as the weight of everything pilled up and the fire destroyed the support structure around the initial impact zones. For the north tower, this is illustrated by the model on the second picture.
Now, one of the many problems with that theory is that this spire that briefly appeared after the collapse was finished simply should not exist. If the combined weight of everything was what rapidly brought down each floor as the tower fell, then how did this structure survive? Logically, it should have been destroyed with everything else around it according to the models. Even in those models which show a portion of the lower structure surviving for a few seconds after the initial collapse, the spire is never shown.
It just doesn't make sense, it shouldn't exist – unless of course a controlled demolition occurred, at which point the explosives would have been the cause of the collapse and not the weight of the upper floors. Only then would it be feasible that such a feature could have survived.
Posted by Dry-Selection421
7 Comments
Actio= reactio. If the top pulverized the bottom part(which is thicker) than the bottom part would pulverize the top to. But on this day physics didn’t seem to care.
Edit: typo
The towers were melted internally , which is ironically funny cause it was a controlled demolition
The towers feel within their own footprint and also WC7 fell the exact same way , which again is kinda wild
That was a woman I forget her name she wrote a book about this and showed video in a talk, showing this exact thing she called it dustification because there is no word for what happened to the towers when looked at very closely
911- nuclear war game
https://youtu.be/VDPafE3dCDE?is=y-DxR7yg5c1QhTK1
Yeah. Why didn’t controlled demolition expolosves bring it down?
This object obviously wasn’t free-floating which means it was embedded. The material(i.e. floor) it was embedded in would therefore have a gap or hole in which the object fit. If the object and the material did not have a structural arrangement then their attachment was weak meaning that the object and material would have structural independence. The material and object could slide apart once external structural components were compromised.
A washer when placed on a straw would fall to the bottom of the straw once your hand lets go. The straw still stands