The same leadership that wants to restrict gender affirming care and vaccines for children on the grounds of potential harm is proposing to make it easier to put chemicals linked to reproductive and developmental harm into their food. If there was ever a reason to believe that their concern was entirely performative for their voter base, it’s this.
firewaterstone on
Big deal. They allow toxic chemicals WITH safety review LOL.
4 Comments
This is what Republicans meant by “smaller government.”
If you thought the frogs were gay before, you have no idea what’s coming
>But campaigners say many chemicals, especially hormone disruptors linked to brain damage and reproductive harm in children, are considered dangerous at levels far below 0.5ppb. Even in its limited form, the loophole has already raised alarm. One TOR exemption that allows the rocket fuel chemical perchlorate to be used in grain bags [dramatically increased](https://blogs.edf.org/health/2019/01/11/fda-perchlorate-in-food/) the amount of the compound found in kids’ cereal, which advocates say could cause [brain damage](https://blogs.edf.org/health/2019/10/29/edf-joins-court-challenge-of-fdas-refusal-to-ban-use-of-perchlorate-in-food-contact-materials/).
The same leadership that wants to restrict gender affirming care and vaccines for children on the grounds of potential harm is proposing to make it easier to put chemicals linked to reproductive and developmental harm into their food. If there was ever a reason to believe that their concern was entirely performative for their voter base, it’s this.
Big deal. They allow toxic chemicals WITH safety review LOL.