This is a repost of the previous one (‘Two pictures in the Oval Office. Trump looks identical in both down to the askew tie. Was he even there?’). I just couldn’t add a picture to my reply.
I made a Photoshop overlay, just fixing the zoom and rotation (sloppy work; it could be done better). The third picture from the left is a 50/50 overlay of both photos, and yes, he wasn’t there. It was Photoshopped.
The question is: why? Did Katie do it herself, or did the White House propaganda department fix it for her?
Sources:
Posted by Life_Fishing_3025
6 Comments
I’m shocked — ***Shocked!*** to hear gambling is going on in this establishment.
At some point we’re gonna have a president who isn’t so old and senile that they’ll actually be able to do things themselves for real and won’t require this degree of smoke and mirrors. I just know it. Any election cycle now…
Thanks. Really helpful!
His smile and his hair is slightly different, along with creases in his jacket on his right arm (camera left) being slightly different. The chair also shows more of the (camera) left side in the photo of the two of them compared to the full family photo.
The reflections also look slightly different and match what’s in the photo on if you look at the desk.
His reflection in the window directly behind him also changes.
I don’t think this is AI generated and it also doesn’t show any AI signals according to OpenAI’s verification tool.
I think that these are posed pictures taken some seconds apart, and Trump is basically frozen into what they consider his most “photogenic” pose, which he is doing a good job holding. You can see in his face that he wants to get over with this, though. That’s why he looks somewhat “constipated”.
Just tried googling these fucking weirdos, there’s like nothing about them online. They’re so strange. She doesn’t even have parents. Nothing about his background either. Just a little blurb about how they worked in China and he’s somehow a movie producer. How strange this all is and what are the odds they both working in “GINA” at the same time.