5 Comments

    1. In November 2021, Gavin Schmidt, one of the primary programmers of the NASA climate model, stated in the Spectator that the model’s track record dating back to the 1970s *“shows they have skillfully predicted the trends of the past decades.”*

      However, after the initial laughter subsided, an expert analysis of NASA’s GISS Model E, comprising approximately 441,668 lines of FORTRAN code from around 1983, emerged.

      Criticisms have surfaced regarding features such as water that doesn’t freeze and “negative” cloud cover, leading some to question the claim that the model is truly “physics-based.” This analogy draws parallels to how Hollywood producers describe a movie as being “based on a true story,” [notes the ](https://dailysceptic.org/2023/07/10/climate-models-come-with-dangerous-co2-warming-baked-in-code-review-finds/)[*Daily Sceptic*](https://dailysceptic.org/2023/07/10/climate-models-come-with-dangerous-co2-warming-baked-in-code-review-finds/)*.*

      Willis Eschenbach, a seasoned computer programmer, has conducted a comprehensive analysis published by Net Zero Watch (NZW) titled “Climate Models and Climate Muddles.” NZW’s Andrew Montford discussed Eschenbach’s paper [in a recent edition of the *Daily Sceptic*](https://dailysceptic.org/2023/06/30/nasa-climate-model-fails-at-basic-physics-report-finds/), highlighting the central role of climate models in the global warming concern and their association with the collective Net Zero project’s weather-related warnings.

    Leave A Reply