To be clear, anyone who shared this mentality at the initial roll out of the so-called vaccines is a traitor to humankind. He has no hesitation talking about how bad these shots were, so as to align himself with the small pocket of rational population why didn't drink the kool-aid, but let's be honest, he is and always has been just another head of the same hydra that is waging war on the human spirit.

    Posted by Konval

    23 Comments

    1. MediocreAd8385 on

      To be fair, he did say J&J first, which was the only one I would’ve trusted. And then they stopped making it. So maybe that WAS the good one and that’s the reason they stopped giving it. You never know 🤷‍♀️
      FYI I’m not vaccinated and I don’t trust him or any of them either. Lol. Just a thought.

    2. Inebriaded-Logic on

      I never trust any of these people, they’ll always show you who they really are and what they’re about. Plus they all have their marching orders and they all play their characters very well in the big show.

    3. I mean you can trust him if you want to. I personally trust no one have I have not been able to speak to face to face. I don’t trust most of those people either. 🤪

    4. Faith_Location_71 on

      He wants you to be a no-brainer, non-thinking and compliant drone. He wants you to outsource your thinking to him like the monster he is.

    5. Aggressive-King3203 on

      Vivek is gonna come out with a H5N1 Vaxx and Trump and Elon are gonna deemed it safe and then all the Trump people will get it

    6. We need to change the definition of words “science” and “unequivocal” if we are to trust this.

      CDC Removes Critical Words From Vaccine Definition

      To fully understand the importance of the change, it’s crucial to note that, before the COVID pandemic, the definition of a vaccine had been relatively stable for nearly a couple decades with minor word changes occurring every few years. All through that time the intent of a vaccine — to give you immunity by protecting you from a specific disease — had remained basically the same.

      For example, according to an archived snapshot of the CDC’s website, the definition of a vaccine February 24, 2011, was:

      “A product that produces immunity therefore protecting the body from the disease. Vaccines are administered through needle injections, by mouth and by aerosol.”

      By July 2015, the wording had changed to:

      “A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed in the nose.”

      The wording was the same in June 2017

      and likewise in June 2019

      and June 2020.

      By August 26, 2021,

      however, the definition had changed slightly to add the words “to produce immunity”:

      “A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.”

      Then, less than a week later, just days after the FDA gave final approval to Pfizer’s mRNA jab, the definition changed again, September 1, 2021 — this time, significantly. The definition of a vaccine now reads:

      “A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, butsome can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.”

      As you’ll note, the second sentence remains the same. It is the first part of the definition that has dramatically changed. In the latest definition, a vaccine:

      Is no longer a “product” but instead is a “preparation”

      No longer directly stimulates the immune response, but is used to stimulate the system

      Does not produce immunity

      Stimulates the immune response against diseases, not against a specific disease

      No longer protects a person from the disease

      These dramatic changes were likely created to allow the CDC, FDA and other governmental agencies to call the genetic therapy experiment being administered worldwide a “vaccine” — while they knew full well the so-called “vaccine” was not created to either produce immunity or prevent transmission of disease. In fact, by any definition of a vaccine in use before 2021, this jab is not a vaccine.

      Roast me shillbo baggins

    7. Another medical expert opinion. Zero evidence. Only an allergic reaction, but don’t worry, we got an epi pen! Haha this is just great.

    8. To quote the great orator Cameron Poe; There’s only two people I trust, one is me and the other isn’t Elon Musk.

    9. LanceHardwick on

      disambiguate what he is saying. it also applies if he’s communicating that the jab is bad.

      it’s a “no-brainer”

    10. TechnicallydaTruth on

      Trump said to take the COVID shot, too. The difference is that people on the right don’t act like sheep and do everything the latest narrative says to do.

    11. GodBlessYouNow on

      Centralized power is cancer to society no matter who gets elected 👈 NO MATTER WHO gets elected 👈

    Leave A Reply