I came over this reel by user cancelthisclothingcompany on instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C-jaYvPpATn/?igsh=MWo5aG1mbXNsb2dzMQ==

    In there he is talking about someone having deleted all traces of Epstein connections to Clinton from wikipedia.

    He is using the waybackmachine to find information about the changes, but you can actually see on wikipedia when and what changes are made to an article.

    Turns out that indeed on 22. of July user ThingsCanOnlyGetWetter deleted that whole paragraph and implied that he moved them to an article that deals with all sexual accusations against Clinton.

    Low and behold, the name Epstein isn’t even mentioned.

    Here is a link to the revision page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bill_Clinton&diff=prev&oldid=1236064272

    Turns out, that this particular user joined Wikipedia in June 2024 and already made over 10,000 edits since.

    A quick look on his „talk“ page reveals, that there seems to be some grand scheme behind it. I suppose someone is trying to rewrite history big time.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ThingsCanOnlyGetWetter

    I also suppose this user is an AI by the provided answers.

    tl;dr: AI is trying to rewrite history.

    Posted by vandaalen

    3 Comments

    1. The only history that’s real is that which is printed in books. And there only sparingly.

    2. I know all of these ppl are involved in some heinous things but I don’t believe they are at the core of all of this. They could have easily knocked off Epstein if they wanted to and swept it all under the rug and no one would have been the wiser. They had a show trial which was ridiculous. Seems like all of this is a case of look here not over there. They only tell us what they want us to hear.

    3. I know that it’s possible to download Wikipedia for offline viewing. I wonder if there’s a site that provides something like provide historical yearly snapshots of Wikipedia (just did a quick search and didn’t find one, but that doesn’t mean one doesn’t exist)? Could be interesting to analyze.

    Leave A Reply