What if I told you ‘dragons’ never disappeared they were just rebranded?

    In the 1600s, large bones were called ‘dragon bones.’ In the 1800s, those same fossils became ‘dinosaurs.’ Why?

    Did the scientific community deliberately distance itself from mythology to ensure credibility? Did the word ‘dragon’ hold too much cultural weight to be taken seriously? My research explores whether the renaming of fossils was part of a historical cover-up or just a linguistic shift.

    The full breakdown is here: The dragosaur hypothesis

    Posted by TrinityMayhem

    1 Comment

    1. Dragons were rather non-specific and encompassed everything from flying skysnakes to sea monsters.

    Leave A Reply