Does this include everyone using Luigi as a solution to them dealing with someone they disagree with?
DaWhiteSingh on
If it’s banned, can you even see it? So you’ll be warned upvoted something that Reddit Mods bans later.
Yeah this is going well.
Froggyx on
>dont click on the thing on our website
Reddit putting the burden of banned content on innocent users.
aacool on
Good idea to downvote stuff you agree with, like this article 🙂
Orpherischt on
> […] Warnings will initially be issued to users who upvote violent content, but Reddit may expand the types of content it sends warnings for down the line. […]
> > eg. *A violent wind ripped the branch from the tree.*
Whatever you do, do not upvote anything where things are moving fast. Don’t upvote any discussion about ‘Fast and the Furious’. Do not upvote footage of tornadoes. Do not upvote discussions about the Olympic 100m race. Too much violent motion.
> .2. Involving physical conflict.
> > eg. *We would rather negotiate, but we will use violent means if necessary.*
ie. Do not upvote anything to do with WWF wrestling or boxing or fencing or any such things. Do not upvote action movie clips on reddit movies. Whatever you do, do not upvote the thread with the trailer to the new Mission Impossible movie. Much too violent.
> .3. Likely to use physical force.
ie. Do not upvote the new poster for *The Accountant 2*. Those guys look potentially agressive. Do not upvote anything where gravity is overcome by mechanical means. Beware supporting content that involves humans moving at all.
> .4. Intensely vivid.
> > eg. *The artist expressed his emotional theme through violent colors.*
ie. only upvote monochrome content.
> .5. Produced or effected by force; not spontaneous; unnatural.
ie. beware upvoting any Hollywood movies or News clips, and particularly Star Wars material. Too much Force. Unnatural witchery.
Also, only upvote things that happen as a matter of course, and without human interference. You can film a waterfall (as long as the water doesn’t fall too fast and splash too ‘violently’) but don’t upvote it, if a human sticks his arm through the water, which would cause the water to be diverted unnaturally off of it’s usual course.
You can upvote a video clip of a car moving slowly forward down an incline, but don’t upvote it if the driver uses force to turn the steering wheel and diverts the vehicle from it’s natural course. This is an abuse of force.
Don’t upvote any thread where words such as ‘offensive’ or ‘violent’ appear. These words are offensive and violent, after all.
> In logic, *reductio ad absurdum* (Latin for “reduction to absurdity”), also known as *argumentum ad absurdum* (Latin for “argument to absurdity”) or apagogical argument, is the form of argument that attempts to establish a claim by showing that the opposite scenario would lead to absurdity or contradiction.
> This argument form traces back to Ancient Greek philosophy and has been used throughout history in both formal mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate. In mathematics, the technique is called proof by contradiction.
> In formal logic, this technique is captured by an axiom for “Reductio ad Absurdum”, normally given the abbreviation RAA, which is expressible in propositional logic. […]
8 Comments
Does this include everyone using Luigi as a solution to them dealing with someone they disagree with?
If it’s banned, can you even see it? So you’ll be warned upvoted something that Reddit Mods bans later.
Yeah this is going well.
>dont click on the thing on our website
Reddit putting the burden of banned content on innocent users.
Good idea to downvote stuff you agree with, like this article 🙂
> […] Warnings will initially be issued to users who upvote violent content, but Reddit may expand the types of content it sends warnings for down the line. […]
What is the definition of ‘violent’ then?
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/violent
> 1. Involving extreme force or motion.
> > eg. *A violent wind ripped the branch from the tree.*
Whatever you do, do not upvote anything where things are moving fast. Don’t upvote any discussion about ‘Fast and the Furious’. Do not upvote footage of tornadoes. Do not upvote discussions about the Olympic 100m race. Too much violent motion.
> .2. Involving physical conflict.
> > eg. *We would rather negotiate, but we will use violent means if necessary.*
ie. Do not upvote anything to do with WWF wrestling or boxing or fencing or any such things. Do not upvote action movie clips on reddit movies. Whatever you do, do not upvote the thread with the trailer to the new Mission Impossible movie. Much too violent.
> .3. Likely to use physical force.
ie. Do not upvote the new poster for *The Accountant 2*. Those guys look potentially agressive. Do not upvote anything where gravity is overcome by mechanical means. Beware supporting content that involves humans moving at all.
> .4. Intensely vivid.
> > eg. *The artist expressed his emotional theme through violent colors.*
ie. only upvote monochrome content.
> .5. Produced or effected by force; not spontaneous; unnatural.
ie. beware upvoting any Hollywood movies or News clips, and particularly Star Wars material. Too much Force. Unnatural witchery.
Also, only upvote things that happen as a matter of course, and without human interference. You can film a waterfall (as long as the water doesn’t fall too fast and splash too ‘violently’) but don’t upvote it, if a human sticks his arm through the water, which would cause the water to be diverted unnaturally off of it’s usual course.
You can upvote a video clip of a car moving slowly forward down an incline, but don’t upvote it if the driver uses force to turn the steering wheel and diverts the vehicle from it’s natural course. This is an abuse of force.
Don’t upvote any thread where words such as ‘offensive’ or ‘violent’ appear. These words are offensive and violent, after all.
—
* *”Directed Energy”* = **747** latin-agrippa
* … ( *”Reductio Ad Absurdum”* = 1,**747** trigonal )
* .. [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum ]
> In logic, *reductio ad absurdum* (Latin for “reduction to absurdity”), also known as *argumentum ad absurdum* (Latin for “argument to absurdity”) or apagogical argument, is the form of argument that attempts to establish a claim by showing that the opposite scenario would lead to absurdity or contradiction.
> This argument form traces back to Ancient Greek philosophy and has been used throughout history in both formal mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate. In mathematics, the technique is called proof by contradiction.
> In formal logic, this technique is captured by an axiom for “Reductio ad Absurdum”, normally given the abbreviation RAA, which is expressible in propositional logic. […]
R.A.A @ 18.1.1 –> 9.1.1
* *”Solve It”* = **911** trigonal
* … *”Unopposed”* = **2001** squares
—
—
.
—
EDIT – published 30 minutes later to reddit worldnews:
> South Korean fighter jet accidentally drops bombs on civilian village, injuring seven
Sorry for the seven of you that read this post before this edit.
* The *”Writer”* = **888** trigonal ( *”The Wordplays”* = **555** primes )
* … is *”A South Korean fighter jet”* = 3,**888** squares | 1,**555** latin-agrippa
* … .. ( *”Revelation”* = *”Fighter Jets”* = **1010** latin-agrippa ) ( *”The Tribulation”* = **555** primes )
—
* *”To Decrypt It”* = **911** latin-agrippa
* … *”as Allegorical Bomb”* = 1,**911** trigonal
* …. .. ( *”A Blast”* = **911** squares ) ( *”Explosion”* = **11**0**9** trigonal )
‘South Korean fighter jet’ –> ‘Southern Crown spellcaster’ (me)
‘civilian village’ –> ‘reddit conspiracy forum’ (you)
* *”Citizen”* = **666** latin-agrippa ( *”A Trauma”* = **1337** squares )
* … ( *”The Civilian Village”* = **1666** latin-agrippa | **1337** trigonal
—
Q: *”The Teacher?”* = **1337** squares
*”A: The Truth Bomb”* = **1337** trigonal | 492 primes | 2,521 squares
—
PS. Do not upvote me! My words are violent.
Submission statement: potential for censorship based on agreement with ‘banned’ posts on Reddit
Nice, an indicator to see if I’m on the right track…
Reddit, where the truth and free speech come to die. Vote blue!Â