* ***Canada will be developing a national trade strategy, PM says.***
* ***Carney says federal government would set up a “one project, one review” system to speed up approval for major projects.***
* ***Federal government will temporarily remove the one-week waiting period for employment insurance.***
Goodness, it was only november I was telling some normies about the trade barriers and how impossible it seemed that they would ever be taken down
ldn6 on
My king.
(Charles don’t hate me I still want to be your subject.)
OkEntertainment1313 on
Headline: “Free trade by Canada Day” between provinces and territories.
Quote from article: “We intend **from a federal level** to have free trade by Canada Day”
Extrapolation of statement in the article: “We are committing to removing **all federal exemptions** under the Canada free-trade agreement”
Broader context: Over 50% of all regulatory hurdles to interprovincial trade are from the Province of Quebec. **Over 35 exceptions in the provincial free trade agreement are made for Quebec.** In this same article, Legault is open to the idea but insists social norms in Quebec have to be respected and that Canada’s retaliatory tariffs need to be limited to negate impacts on Canadians.
u/SwimmingYams, this isn’t even what I was talking about with you the other day, but it’s close. The PM promises to do their part at the federal level to facilitate this by Canada Day, which isn’t even a significant root cause of the problem. Some editor at CBC makes a headline that *doesn’t even use the same quote* to make it look like what the PM is actually stating is that interprovincial trade barriers will be all gone by Canada Day. They can say “Well the information is all in the article,” but nobody can really deny that most people just read headlines. It’s not implicitly malicious or biased, but it does make me call into question why they altered the quote to completely take the headline outside of the broader context.
5 Comments
* ***Canada will be developing a national trade strategy, PM says.***
* ***Carney says federal government would set up a “one project, one review” system to speed up approval for major projects.***
* ***Federal government will temporarily remove the one-week waiting period for employment insurance.***
!ping Can
https://preview.redd.it/z6y9595k05qe1.jpeg?width=771&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c7e81369e5a43b19ed1931f29369ef2c30f6bf5d
Goodness, it was only november I was telling some normies about the trade barriers and how impossible it seemed that they would ever be taken down
My king.
(Charles don’t hate me I still want to be your subject.)
Headline: “Free trade by Canada Day” between provinces and territories.
Quote from article: “We intend **from a federal level** to have free trade by Canada Day”
Extrapolation of statement in the article: “We are committing to removing **all federal exemptions** under the Canada free-trade agreement”
Broader context: Over 50% of all regulatory hurdles to interprovincial trade are from the Province of Quebec. **Over 35 exceptions in the provincial free trade agreement are made for Quebec.** In this same article, Legault is open to the idea but insists social norms in Quebec have to be respected and that Canada’s retaliatory tariffs need to be limited to negate impacts on Canadians.
u/SwimmingYams, this isn’t even what I was talking about with you the other day, but it’s close. The PM promises to do their part at the federal level to facilitate this by Canada Day, which isn’t even a significant root cause of the problem. Some editor at CBC makes a headline that *doesn’t even use the same quote* to make it look like what the PM is actually stating is that interprovincial trade barriers will be all gone by Canada Day. They can say “Well the information is all in the article,” but nobody can really deny that most people just read headlines. It’s not implicitly malicious or biased, but it does make me call into question why they altered the quote to completely take the headline outside of the broader context.