Geraldo Rivera exposes NASA cover up of Challenger disaster – Coroner denied access to astronauts remains

In 1986, the space shuttle "Challenger," originally built in 1979 as a test model, was on its 25th and final mission. The mission ended in tragedy when the shuttle exploded shortly after launch, purportedly killing all seven astronauts aboard.
Decades later, individuals with the same names, ages, and striking physical resemblances to the deceased astronauts were discovered living. Notably: Richard Scobee with only 16 men with his name in the U.S. Judith Resnik with only 6 women with her name in the U.S. And Michael J. Smith with a fairly common name. No birth records for the supposed twins of astronauts Ronald McNair and Elison Onizuka.
Judith Resnik's pre-1986 publications had post-1986 submission dates, and her academic credentials were unverifiable.
Video comparisons showed identical speech patterns and dialects between the living Judith Resnik and the astronaut.
Coroners were denied access to the astronauts' remains, and no one outside of NASA has seen or photographed them, casting doubt on the official narrative. Concerns about the shuttle's safety were ignored, suggesting possible knowledge of the risks. Post-disaster, NASA received significant funding, and the astronauts' families were compensated handsomely, hinting at potential motives for staging or allowing the disaster. Theories have emerged suggesting that the crew may not have been on board the Challenger when it exploded. The anomalies suggest a cover-up where astronauts might have been given new identities to protect them from known dangers or to serve undisclosed purposes. Without access to remains or detailed technical reports, confirming the astronauts' fates is challenging. The secrecy around the disaster questions the transparency of public institutions responsible for space exploration.This scenario paints a picture of a possible conspiracy where the 1986 Challenger Shuttle disaster might not have been as straightforward as initially reported. The combination of identity anomalies, documentation discrepancies, and the lack of forensic evidence supports theories of astronaut survival and a staged event for various motives. Further investigation would be necessary to uncover the truth, respecting both the families involved and the integrity of space exploration history.