SS: This misdirection is aimed at re-establishing the element of surprise ahead of the imminent attack on Iran, which requires both a sustained air bombardment and a ground operation at the nuclear sites.
For the attack to have at least some chance of success, it is essential for the element of surprise to be re-established. The fake “negotiations” in Oman with the Iranians, the demotion of Watlz, the whining about “neo-cons” like in the Saudi Arabia speech, the fake “defeat” against the Houthis and all the fake “leaks” about how Trump is really very angry and feels betrayed by Netanyahu, are all intentionally designed to create a feeling of passivity among the Iranians and the belief that the attack may not actually happen.
Faith_Location_71 on
I don’t believe it, and I haven’t believed it since it was first mentioned. I kind of *want* to believe it – the thought of Israel having to actually stop their genocide would be some good news. But I don’t find this credible from either of these two slimeballs.
2 Comments
SS: This misdirection is aimed at re-establishing the element of surprise ahead of the imminent attack on Iran, which requires both a sustained air bombardment and a ground operation at the nuclear sites.
For the attack to have at least some chance of success, it is essential for the element of surprise to be re-established. The fake “negotiations” in Oman with the Iranians, the demotion of Watlz, the whining about “neo-cons” like in the Saudi Arabia speech, the fake “defeat” against the Houthis and all the fake “leaks” about how Trump is really very angry and feels betrayed by Netanyahu, are all intentionally designed to create a feeling of passivity among the Iranians and the belief that the attack may not actually happen.
I don’t believe it, and I haven’t believed it since it was first mentioned. I kind of *want* to believe it – the thought of Israel having to actually stop their genocide would be some good news. But I don’t find this credible from either of these two slimeballs.