I still think about what actually hit the Pentagon on 9/11. I’ve watched that grainy 5-frame CCTV fucking footage more times than I can count, and I still don’t see a plane. it just does not sit with me it was a plane Just a flash and then a tiny explosion. That’s it? From the most heavily surveilled building in the country?
My dad was working in D.C. that day and drove home on 395 right after the attack. He saw the Pentagon and said the hole didn’t even look big enough for a plane just this small gash in the side. No wings, no debris.
My parents lived about 7 miles away back then 5714 Seminary Rd in Falls Church(don't live there anymore)and they actually felt the impact. Like, full-on shockwave. Stuff fell off shelves in our apartment. That always stuck with me. Can a commercial jet crash really do that from that far out?
Then I read a testimony from someone online who lived just a few miles from us who felt the same exact boom. She later learned it may have been fighter jets breaking the sound barrier. That got me thinking……if jets were already in the air, is it totally out there to wonder if one of them launched something, like a cruise missile, at the Pentagon? Especially if the original target plane (like Flight 93) got compromised and they needed to react fast?
https://www.americanseptember.com/virginia.html. testimony #24
I’d literally kill to know what actually hit that building. I’m not deep into conspiracies, but something about this never added up. And it drives me nuts how easily people accepted the official story and just moved on.
Posted by BangThenBounce
25 Comments
It was a missile. Also building 7 was controlled demolition same as the towers.
Our District Manager worked at the Pentagon during 9-11. Her and her team had a meeting in one of the offices that got obliterated by the “attack” but it was rescheduled and no one ended up being in the room. She was just down the hall though when everything transpired and was absolutely VEHEMENT it wasn’t a plane.
They call the Pentagon a “fortress” but I guess one without any decent cameras watching it. There’s that one grainy video, and they even have a worse version in black and white, but not a single video of the full plane.
The response crew ran out on the Pentagon lawn and started recovering debris before even helping victims.
Also this was a crime scene, they weren’t allowed to do that, same with the towers.
There were two simultaneous videos from the parking gates. Apparently the people who made September 11 A New Pearl Harbor discovered through analysis that a frame that SHOULD show the full plane does not, indicating it was manipulated before release.
What a shock our government was fibbing.🤬
Do people born in the 21st century even know that the Pentagon was “hit” by a plane on 9/11 ?
It’s barely talked about.
Modern aircraft are designed specifically for the empennage (tail section) to withstand this type of crash. It’s the reason why the “black box” is installed way back there…unless I’m WILDLY out of the loop, there were never any photographs released of the “crash sight” which include any empennage, wing, or landing gear components. Which, as an additional note are made primarily of magnesium which burns at a far higher temperature than the wood and such that the Pentagon is comprised of, so yeah, you would DEFINITELY find landing gear components, at a minimum. All in all, the evidence of it being a plane just isn’t there….source: 20 years of being an aircraft mechanic….
Now I eat up the 9/11 inside job theory. There is a group called “Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth” that goes hard in the paint on the three towers.
I mention that because some of them also did a deep dive on the Pentagon. Their claim is that I was at least a plane sized object that collided with the Pentagon. I can’t find the video of the break down anymore, but there are some key pieces of evidence that essentially rule out a missile strike. Namely that light poles were taken out by this objects wing span on the way in, and a large industrial gen-set was also tossed when it impacted the engine.
The security cam footage is also addressed. Basically that between the frame rate and the lens used, what is a plane sized object is reduced to a 1 frame blur.
The approach angle and speed are even less believable. Especially for an amateur pilot (at best) in a commercial aircraft. The plane was mere meters off the ground on approach.
Also very convenient that the office that got hit just so happened to house all the paper financial records of CIA’s unaccounted for trillion dollars. For which the meeting was supposed to be the next day.
The world is run by gangsters. Always has, always will be.
The entire thing stinks to high heavens when you put it all together. One of those conspiracies that will probably be proven true in our lifetime based on how much evidence there is to back it up
I’ve heard it was a torpedo or missile from a submarine, but I dunno. Definitely not a jumbo jet though.
Even worse, the “plane crash” site in PA
Not a single piece of aircraft anywhere.
What about the people on the plane? I know a guy who had a cousin who worked for National Geographic and she supposedly died on that flight
Totally legit conspiracy as long as you ignore all the eyewitness accounts from drivers on nearby roads who actually watched AA Flight 77 crash into the Pentagon.
Didn’t the plane basically land. Hitting the Pentagon on the 3rd floor, seems harder than crashing into a skyscraper
Maybe someone in that part of the Pentagon was a target. Maybe a whistleblower. But yeah, the Pentagon hit was very unusual and for amateurs flying a jet, not likely.
If you guys remember, they had excavators out there cleaning up the site before a proper investigation could even be done. All the cctv cameras in the surrounding area were taken as well.
A whole lot more than the Pentagon on 9/11 annoys me.
Imagine trying to get away with it now considering the number of drivers with dash-cams.
I have wondered this one myself. I live 80 miles south of DC and even our local news barely covered the Pentagon crash but for a solid week it was NYC and Pennsylvania nonstop. We actually discussed this a bit while going through this, the hubs and I. Our daughter had just turned One on the 28th of August about two weeks before.
Not only was there a significantly less amount of Pentagon information on the national news outlets but also on our local Richmond stations but we had so much coverage and video bombardment of the World Trade Center attacks and a lot of discussion about the he developing stories of the heros of Flight 93. And I have nothing ever disrespectful or devaluing for any part of 9/11, but I always found it odd that such limited information was being released or even first hand accounts from witnesses concerning the Pentagon.
Do I have an alternative explanation? No. It could have been literally anything because that day proved to America that yes, anything can happen.
Just wanted to add that. If anyone else in my area remembers this, let me know!
I remember seeing a website that’s still up, I’ll have to find it, that went in depth on the pentagon. The highlights were streetlights “cut” allegedly by the wings of the plane on approach, but in the wrong spot based on how the plane approached based on the official story. The taxi driver interview immediately afterwards, the guy who had a light pole sticking out of his cab, says he was told to say what he said by men in suits, pictures immediately after the crash showing zero plane debris, and so on. It’s also very strange how stores with cctv that would’ve captured the attack had gov employees show up within minutes to confiscate their cctv footage. Think about it…if the pentagon actually got hit by a plane and it was somewhat of a surprise, do we really expect them to be so efficient at response that within 2-3 minutes they’re showing up at surrounding businesses to get their cctv footage? Not a chance, unless they were already waiting to go get it before the attack.
Not to mention, you’re telling me an amateur pilot is able to maneuver a plane like that, that close to the ground, and hit their target that perfectly without either missing high or crashing short? Seems like a pretty incredible feat
I think the plane that landed in PA was supposed to hit the Pentagon, when everything started to go haywire, they just used a cruise missile.
[https://imgur.com/a/ORkxwGc](https://imgur.com/a/ORkxwGc)
Some of the principal data that must be explained and some food for thought on 9/11:
The Twin Towers were destroyed faster than physics can explain by a free fall speed “collapse.” They underwent mid-air pulverization (dustification) and were turned to dust before they hit the ground. The protective bathtub was not significantly damaged by the destruction of the Twin Towers. The rail lines, the tunnels and most of the rail cars had only light damage, if any. The WTC underground mall survived well, witnessed by Warner Bros. Road Runner and friends. There were reports that “The Gap” was looted. The seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on a comparison with the Kingdome controlled demolition. The Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, not bottom up. The demolition of WTC7 was whisper quiet and the seismic signal was not significantly greater than background noise. The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth. The upper 90 percent, approximately, of the inside of WTC7 was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth. One file cabinet with folder dividers survived.
No toilets survived or even recognizable portions of one. Windows of nearby buildings had circular and other odd-shaped holes in them. In addition to the odd window damage, the marble facade was completely missing from around WFC1 and WFC2 entry, with no other apparent structural damage. Fuzzballs, evidence that the dust continued to break down and become finer and finer. Truckloads of dirt were hauled in and hauled out of the WTC site, a pattern that continues to this day. Fuming of the dirt pile. Fuming decreased when watered, contrary to fumes caused by fire or heat. Fuzzyblobs, a hazy cloud that appeared to be around material being destroyed. The Swiss-Cheese appearance of steel beams and glass. Evidence of molecular dissociation and transmutation, as demonstrated by the near-instant rusting of affected steel. Weird fires. The appearance of fire, but without evidence of heating. Lack of high heat. Witnesses reported that the initial dust cloud felt cooler than ambient temperatures. No evidence of burned bodies.
Columns were curled around a vertical axis like rolled-up carpets, where overloaded buckled beams should be bent around the horizontal axis. Office paper was densely spread throughout lower Manhattan, unburned, often along side cars that appeared to be burning. Vertical round holes were cut into buildings 4, 5 and 6, and into Liberty street in front of Bankers Trust, and into Vesey Street in front of WTC6, plus a cylindrical arc was cut into Bankers Trust. All planes except top secret missions were ordered down until 10:31 a.m. (when only military flights were allowed to resume), after both towers were destroyed, and only two minutes (120 seconds) after WTC 1 had been destroyed. Approximately 1,400 motor vehicles were towed away, toasted in strange ways, during the destruction of the Twin Towers. The order and method of destruction of each tower minimized damage to the bathtub and adjacent buildings. More damage was done to the bathtub by earth-moving equipment during the clean-up process than from the destruction of more than a million tons of buildings above it.
Twin Tower control without damaging neighboring buildings, in fact all seriously damaged and destroyed buildings had a WTC prefix. The north wing of WTC 4 was left standing, neatly sliced from the main body which virtually disappeared. For more than seven years, regions in the ground under where the main body of WTC4 stood have continued to fume. The WTC1 and WTC2 rubble pile was far too small to account for the total mass of the buildings. The WTC7 rubble pile was too small for the total mass of the building and consisted of a lot of mud. Eyewitness testimony about toasted cars, instant disappearance of people by “unexplained” waves, a plane turning into a mid-air fireball, electrical power cut off moments before WTC 2 destruction, and the sound of explosions. Eyewitness testimony of Scott-pack explosions in fire trucks and fire trucks exploding that were parked near the WTC. There were many flipped cars in the neighborhood of the WTC complex near trees with full foliage.
Magnetometer readings in Alaska recorded abrupt shifts in the earth’s magnetic field with each of the events at the WTC on 9/11. Hurricane Erin, located just off Long Island on 9/11/01, went virtually unreported in the days leading up to 9/11, including omission of this Hurricane on the morning weather map, even though that portion of the Atlantic Ocean was shown on the map. Sillystring, the appearance of curious cork-screw trails. Uncanny similarities with the Hutchison Effect, where the Hutchison Effect exhibits all of the same phenomena listed a.
* Is it possible that such a technology exists? Since invention of the microwave for cooking in 1945 and lasers in 1955*, commercial and military development of directed-energy technology has proceeded apace, so use of directed-energy technology is likely to exist — and the data tells us it does exist.