3 Comments

    1. NeedScienceProof on

      SS:

      >Top medical journal insiders admit a whopping portion of peer reviewed published research results are FAKE. Since doctors can’t know the difference, their practice is based on lies. Here’s the scoop.

      >If you’re still clinging to the belief that “science is self-correcting,” or that “peer review ensures quality,” or that “your doctor’s recommendations are grounded in solid science”….

      ***This article will shatter that illusion.***

    2. Explicit_Tech on

      This is something academia already teaches and is aware about. Some courses require you to share poor research articles either published by the media or by the research article themselves. Research articles being retracted is part of that process. It happens all the time.

      What’s funny is when conspiracy theorists share poor research that should be retracted.

    3. Exo-Proctologist on

      >You’re better off flipping a coin than blindly trusting what’s published in medical journals—and frankly, that’s unfair to the coin. The coin isn’t taking bribes from pharmaceutical companies.

      Right out of the gate there is a problem. Nobody “blindly trusts” what is published in medical journals. The point of peer review is specifically to *not* blindly trust, but to scrutinize and test. Absolutely nobody in accredited academia has read a scientific paper’s conclusion and said “well, it’s in a published journal so it must be true! Let’s teach it in schools without a second thought!”

      This is the strawman’s idea of what peer review and self-correcting processes is.

    Leave A Reply