7 Comments

    1. They are probably part of the same newsletter that is asking them to copy/paste this rhetoric. Similar to how during election season, they have these pre-written messages you can tweet out: “I am voting for Kamala Harris because I believe in healthcare reforms!”, “I am voting for Trump because I am proud pro-lifer!”

      It’s just sad that somewhere along the way people stopped thinking. Whether or not you believe we should be deporting immigration — they are not the reason our education system is a mess, or that we’re having a housing crises, or that our finances are a mess. They’re the scapegoat.

    2. luna_beam_space on

      I would question if these people even had direct control over their accounts

    3. Easy-Tomatillo8 on

      Likely some sort of “content network” I don’t follow current Monetization strategies in social media exactly but it seems to have followed an old digital publisher model but for “influencers” where some main influencer with the largest following coordinates with similar related types to increase reach of content and sells advertising as a package deal with that increased reach across the network of influencers. As such whoever or whatever is controlling said network will have talking points. Where those talking points originally come from is anyone’s guess but it’s probably a think tank or just the associated political party. New media is just old media now but instead of huge entities with high production costs it’s just networks of cheap low overhead cost and easily replaceable independent contractors parading the same shit under the guise of being “truth-full” media.

    Leave A Reply