As opposed to 9/11 where the Pentagon and the Pennsylvania crash sites didn't have a single airplane part to distinguish
Posted by Longjumping-Box5691
As opposed to 9/11 where the Pentagon and the Pennsylvania crash sites didn't have a single airplane part to distinguish
Posted by Longjumping-Box5691
3 Comments
SS the recent tragic crash in India highlights what really happens during a legitimate plane crash.
Plane parts are everywhere.
The events of 9/11 are suspiciously lacking in airplane part debris at the pentagon and in Pennsylvania crash site pictures.
It is astonishing. What is also worth noting is how we can plainly see the airplane the whole time. Unlike the Naudet Hoax. As is the fact that this real crash, like all others involving petroleum products, creates a big cloud of black smoke. Why the white smoke in the Naudet film? They probably elected a new Pope. I don’t want “new 911 investigation.” I am willing to declare that the original spokesmodels have lost all conceivable credibility and, therefore, their ridiculous story about how they murdered Americans can be used at trial rather than printed in textbooks. Oh. And tear down that National Monument in Shanksville. Waterboard Dick Cheney live on TV until he tells us what really happened to Flight 93. If there ever was one, recover it and move the monument to that location. If not, at least we all enjoyed a good half hour of educational TV. Next, put that W person on one of the horsies on a merry go round designed by DARPA. He’ll be frightened, but he’ll get through the confession. It could be a Special. Back to Reality: The Turning Off of the TV of America. You may call me a dreamer.
Buddy if you can’t tell the difference between a plane that stalls and crashes belly first at ~140mph and one that crashes into a concrete building at 530mph, there’s no hope for you.
Regardless, there were plenty of aircraft parts scattered around the pentagon crash site. Are you ignoring those on purpose?