Wait, what?

This nonsense. They should identify stills of the abuser’s face and name – as part of a bringing charges against.

He’s chaos to frame it that way. But technically, they *would* have to produce a video or photograph of an actual crime at this point.

Simply naming someone in a file wouldn’t indicate guilt, even if it was attached to someone’s testimony or an accusation or account of an event. The push back afterwards would be: They were named but they couldn’t substantiate the claim with any proof or evidence, therefore that is why we never charged them with anything.

Not defending anyone. Just saying that’s how it would play out. In order to prove anything, there would need to be physical evidence, like a photo or video that showed the crime. In order to charge anyone who is named in any files, you would also need that type of hard evidence. Everything else would be pure speculation (even tho deep down we know what’s probably true). Just my take on it.

Jesus. It’s actually working.

People’s statements and beliefs are reaching the same level of stupidity this same bullshit has. No structure, no logic. Absolutely no sense. Shit gets so weak you don’t even wanna argue with it.

Thank you father, for teaching me to stfu instead of saying stupid shit. Thank you for never influencing me into following others’ footsteps. No matter how much the world changes, truth never does. I will never be rich, but will die human.

what happened to fuck our feelings?

There prob are no epstein files and ultimately whoever accused epstein is in trouble. And virginia giuffre already knew this was coming which was why she peaced out. Im glad trump doesnt have that option but i wouldnt be surprised if he did the same. Couldnt care less, frankly. Trump was involved in framing epstein. Thats all. Still a massive crime and he also wasted everyone’s goddamn time. Which is literally all usa does anyway