This isn’t directly related to the missing minute of footage heavily discussed elsewhere, but rather other discrepancies between the footage and the testimony.
Anyone talking here should read the article for the full explanation. The article includes pictures of their digital reconstruction of the “Special Housing Unit” and regularly contrasts this digital reconstruction with the released footage and various claims made about these events.
To quickly sum it up for the people who won’t read the article, it suggests that the footage by any interpretation cannot be used to support the idea that nobody could have entered the facility except the guards, or that Epstein actually returned to his cell as opposed to moving elsewhere in the facility when he is observed exiting the footage. Accounts by officials after the fact often overlook this, but the entire basis for the claim neither of these things could have occurred is the testimony of the supposedly sleeping guards.
Additionally, they noticed an orange shadow in the background of part of the footage. The official investigation concluded this was one of the guards (one of the ones who claimed to be sleeping at an indeterminate time) carrying prison uniforms, but just looking at it seems to suggest the figure is wearing a prison uniform, not carrying multiple.
Additionally, some of the supposedly “Raw footage” displays a mouse on screen and there is evidence the video is accelerated at certain points. This indicates both that it is not raw footage, and that the timeline of any events presented in that footage is likely warped. The frame aspect ratio is modified at one point (the “Missing minute” covered elsewhere), suggesting the footage is a composite of at least two sections of footage, making even the “It’s a video of a screen” defence less tenable as it is clearly digitally altered after capture.
An unidentified man dressed as a corrections officer is observed moving around the facility shortly after midnight. Official reports make no mention of this man or what his role should even be.
The sleeping guards claimed nobody but them could have let someone in to see Epstein, but multiple people are observed passing through the door they claim only they can open while they aren’t present. While the door in question is not visible on camera, the staircase leading to it is. The digital reconstruction makes it obvious that they are passing through this door, since it’s unfeasible that multiple prison staff would go into a staircase to idle there for long periods of time.
1 Comment
This isn’t directly related to the missing minute of footage heavily discussed elsewhere, but rather other discrepancies between the footage and the testimony.
Anyone talking here should read the article for the full explanation. The article includes pictures of their digital reconstruction of the “Special Housing Unit” and regularly contrasts this digital reconstruction with the released footage and various claims made about these events.
To quickly sum it up for the people who won’t read the article, it suggests that the footage by any interpretation cannot be used to support the idea that nobody could have entered the facility except the guards, or that Epstein actually returned to his cell as opposed to moving elsewhere in the facility when he is observed exiting the footage. Accounts by officials after the fact often overlook this, but the entire basis for the claim neither of these things could have occurred is the testimony of the supposedly sleeping guards.
Additionally, they noticed an orange shadow in the background of part of the footage. The official investigation concluded this was one of the guards (one of the ones who claimed to be sleeping at an indeterminate time) carrying prison uniforms, but just looking at it seems to suggest the figure is wearing a prison uniform, not carrying multiple.
Additionally, some of the supposedly “Raw footage” displays a mouse on screen and there is evidence the video is accelerated at certain points. This indicates both that it is not raw footage, and that the timeline of any events presented in that footage is likely warped. The frame aspect ratio is modified at one point (the “Missing minute” covered elsewhere), suggesting the footage is a composite of at least two sections of footage, making even the “It’s a video of a screen” defence less tenable as it is clearly digitally altered after capture.
An unidentified man dressed as a corrections officer is observed moving around the facility shortly after midnight. Official reports make no mention of this man or what his role should even be.
The sleeping guards claimed nobody but them could have let someone in to see Epstein, but multiple people are observed passing through the door they claim only they can open while they aren’t present. While the door in question is not visible on camera, the staircase leading to it is. The digital reconstruction makes it obvious that they are passing through this door, since it’s unfeasible that multiple prison staff would go into a staircase to idle there for long periods of time.