2 Comments

    1. TheCancerMan on

      Of course, he said his actions were not influenced by the crime of his relative

      > Prior to the bill passing, the 18-year-old could have faced a charge of child rape, a first-degree felony that would have required them to register as a sex offender, along with a prison sentence ranging anywhere from six years to life in jail.

      >However, the bill allowed a clause that lets 17-year-olds receive a less serious third-degree charge of unlawful sexual activity to be extended to 18-year-olds, provided they were still in high school

      >“Some have suggested this change was made to benefit the case I was made aware of involving the high school senior. That is simply not true,” he said. “While the sponsor of [the bill] was aware of the case, I did not request the legislation and did not intervene or give input on the drafting of the bill.”

    2. HefferTomkins on

      After the covid vaccine and the grooming gangs of flag people it’s so interesting to see people pretend to care about children again. Just the ebbs and flow of the [current thing] virus.

    Leave A Reply