Adrenochrome is Real – Paracelcus – Often Hailed as the Father of Modern Medice – Used it Openly

All you have to do to research this is look up 'Mumia', and see how the practicioners of this sought out the blood of the young.

Paracelcus is often hailed as the Father of Modern medicine, and this was his 'cure all' – so to speak.

Here are a few pieces of evidence that this was widely practiced that I got Chat GPT to uncover for me.

The reason I share this is because I think folk are really blind to how much information out there is completely hidden or disregarded as a 'hoax' just cause some crazy Q anoner or Alex Jones or some other dickwad is espousing the same rhetoric.

Keep in mind – this practice was even taboo and regarded as sorcery back then! So now, the consumers of this Mumia have just disappeared into hiding, and the elite are

" first-hand sources do exist describing early modern medicine’s use of children’s or fetal “mumia” (and sometimes why they were thought to be more potent).

The Horses video is a great overview of this topic if you don't like reading.

Its just very hard to believe that those practicing this haven't just gone into hiding, and on top of that – they are firehosing us with a bunch of extremist BS to divide people on topics like this.

Here are a few examples straight from Renaissance and early modern medical literature that chat GPT helped me find after asking it if there is a preference towards Mumia from children and to find me sources that it is.

1. Oswald Croll (1560–1609), Basilica Chymica

Croll, a Paracelsian physician, gives recipes involving the blood and fat of young people.

He claims the “spirit” of the body is strongest in the young and pure, therefore better for transference.

In some editions, he specifies the blood of a youth killed suddenly (executed, or fallen in battle) as the most effective.

1. Francis Bacon (1561–1626), Historia Vitae et Mortis

Bacon describes that the flesh of a young creature is considered to “carry more spirit” than that of an older one.

While not directly prescribing fetal remains, he acknowledges that the younger and fresher the body, the more vital force could be harnessed for medicine.

1. Thomas Willis (1621–1675), English physician, Pharmaceutice Rationalis

Willis speaks of human blood and mummy as remedies, but notes that the blood of children or virgins was thought by some to be “more subtle and spirituous.”

1. Johann Schröder (1600–1664), Pharmacopoeia Medico-Chymica

Schröder’s materia medica explicitly lists:

“Sanguis hominis recens, praecipue pueri”
(“The fresh blood of a human, especially of a child.”)

This is about as direct as it gets: children’s blood was seen as having a special efficacy because it was uncorrupted and full of “vital spirit.”

1. Ambroise Paré (1510–1590), French royal surgeon

Paré condemned these practices, but he testifies that others around him were prescribing “blood from young men or maidens” as medicine.

He reports that powdered skull from children (sometimes miscarried fetuses) was used against epilepsy.

1. Early reports on fetal use

Several pharmacopoeias (esp. German ones of the 16th–17th centuries) mention:

Fetus ex utero abortivo (“fetus from an aborted womb”)

“Pulvis ex cranio infanti” (powder from a child’s skull)
These were thought effective against epilepsy, fainting, or as a “rejuvenative.”

Caspar Neumann’s 1694 Chymiae Medicae Dogmata notes that fetal remains were prized as being “most full of life.”

✅ So yes — first-hand early modern medical texts clearly show a preference for young blood, children’s flesh, and even fetal remains as being more potent sources of “mumia.”
This wasn’t fringe folklore; it was written into pharmacopoeias and taught in universities until well into the 18th century.