This is the mason brother-hood maggots god
And they take orders from him..
Research ritual black Magick..
They don't call it the craft for nothing..
Posted by Ok-Employment1126
This is the mason brother-hood maggots god
And they take orders from him..
Research ritual black Magick..
They don't call it the craft for nothing..
Posted by Ok-Employment1126
9 Comments
There’s not even a character called lucifer in the Hebrew Bible. But truth and objective reality tend to mean nothing to a certain kind anyway.
Venus
Read into the truth about that symbolism. It’s supposed to represent a yin yang of sorts. Like in the original painting/pictures hands represent – as above – so below. It’s actually fascinating.
Lol, look at OPs history pretty sure hes either a russian bot, conservative bot, or just a box of rocks.
It’s the Jesters that cause all the shit.
Everyone should be looking at the Order of Jesters.
Funny enough they claim that “G” inside the compass stands for the one and only God of all creation, but it’s deception. Theirs is a culture of deception and secrecy.
What the “G” really stands for is Gilgamesh, or Nimrod, the architect of the Tower of Babel. The upper echelons of masonry who are actually in the know have no allegiance to God or the source energy but to the little “g” god Lucifer
This is the dumbest thing ive seen on reddit all day.
Another anti-Mason taking Albert Pike’s quote out of context from page 321 in Morals and Dogma. Read the whole passage and you’ll see Pike was mocking Lucifer’s title of “light-bearer” contrasted with what he’s become since his fall from grace. Takes less than a minute to find the whole quote on Google, and centuries of laziness to keep perpetuating the same allegation, using out-of-context quotes as “evidence” that Masons worship Lucifer.
Lucifer isn’t a proper noun. It’s a derisive nickname for King Nebuchadnezzar II. The book literally spells it out for you, “^(4) you will take up this taunt against the **king of Babylon**”. Verse 5 through 23 is a diss track against the king of Babylon. What’s even better is “Lucifer” doesn’t even appear in *any* of the earliest manuscripts. It says “Oh morning star, Son of Dawn”, which Saint Jerome translated from hebrew to “lux ferre” in the *Latin Vulgate* during the 4th century CE. Later, in the 12th century it was transliterated to “lucifer” from the Latin.
Every time you refer to Lucifer as a proper entity, what you are saying is this: “Hey you know that sentence in Koine Greek that is talking about a Babylonian king? When you translate it from Greek to Latin, and then say the Latin out loud in English it sort of sounds like “Lucifer”, *therefor* that must mean Lucifer is a proper entity.
So fucking stupid.
edit: I know the OT was written in Hebrew, my paraphrastic satire was specifically about the relationship with the word Lucifer as it appears today and the book it appears in, the King James Bible. This version of the Bible was cobbled together from the Masoretic Text and the Septuagint, which was the Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible, among other medieval Greek manuscripts.