Jerry Nadler (D-NY) in 2004: “If someone were deliberately hacking these machines, you could steal millions of votes and no one would know it… We’ve documented a machine in this county that recorded 11,000 extra votes for Bush… These machines are hackable.”
Posted by Effective_Reach_9289
5 Comments
SS: There has been a conspiracy to hide the flaws with the election machines. Previously, there were many politicians sounding the alarm on their vulnerabilities. Now they deliberately hide what they once openly proclaimed.
Voting machines being gaped for interference is nothing new. This was big news at the turn of the century, it was big news for 15 years, then suddenly, all of that was solved and they are 100% accurate 100% of the time. Stop asking.
The 2006 documentary Hacking Democracy is a pretty interesting watch.
I’d also like to remind everyone that Nadler shit his pants on live TV and shuffled off the stage hoping not to let the fresh steamer slip out from the cuff of his slacks.
That’s why it’s important to have a paper ballot and an optical scan counter. The scanner counts the votes and then preserves the ballots in a locked box. Any questions about the accuracy of the scanner can be resolved by manually counting the ballots in the box. Manual counts are only done in the presence of the city clerk and representatives of each major party.
Without the paper ballot, nobody would ever know if the machine switched the votes or not.
They want you to think this is something new, but it’s been like this for a long, long time. In the 1968 election, comedian/activist Dick Gregory at one point had nine million votes in Pennsylvania alone lol. They had to shut down the computers because they apparently programmed them incorrectly.
Nothing is unhackable.