I love so many media outlets calling him a “libertarian”. He is not, and he has, himself, openly disavowed such. He never claimed to be a libertarian, he claims to be a “constitutional conservative”. That’s a conservative, not a libertarian.
>I was assaulted six, seven years ago, attacked from behind, had six ribs broken and part of my lung removed, and still online, on a daily basis people say they wish that it would happen to me all over again, And by sort of making light of what I suffered, they are encouraging other people to do it. That oughta be taken down, and social media oughta be able to take that down.
Social Media can take it down, if they wish. They should not be pressured by the government into taking it down.
For example on reddit, glorifying violence will get taken down because reddit says that breaks the rules. But if reddit said it was OK, it’s not the governments place to tell them otherwise.
>People say, ‘Oh people have a right to say things.’ Well, actually, they don’t necessarily have a right to say things; many people have in their contract what we call a morals clause … or a conduct clause’
Actually they *DO* have a right to say it. It may violate their contract, and there may be consequences (getting fired) but it is still their right to say.
1 Comment
I love so many media outlets calling him a “libertarian”. He is not, and he has, himself, openly disavowed such. He never claimed to be a libertarian, he claims to be a “constitutional conservative”. That’s a conservative, not a libertarian.
>I was assaulted six, seven years ago, attacked from behind, had six ribs broken and part of my lung removed, and still online, on a daily basis people say they wish that it would happen to me all over again, And by sort of making light of what I suffered, they are encouraging other people to do it. That oughta be taken down, and social media oughta be able to take that down.
Social Media can take it down, if they wish. They should not be pressured by the government into taking it down.
For example on reddit, glorifying violence will get taken down because reddit says that breaks the rules. But if reddit said it was OK, it’s not the governments place to tell them otherwise.
>People say, ‘Oh people have a right to say things.’ Well, actually, they don’t necessarily have a right to say things; many people have in their contract what we call a morals clause … or a conduct clause’
Actually they *DO* have a right to say it. It may violate their contract, and there may be consequences (getting fired) but it is still their right to say.