So, like alot the charlie kirk assassination at first made me quite sad, not because I agreed with all his views, but the fact someone could kill a young father over his political beliefs. However recently, I've been going down the rabbit hole and something seems very off. Are people just connecting dots for the sake of it or is the whole world really a stage? Or are the right using his death for political gain?

    Posted by Excellent-Mango-3977

    10 Comments

    1. Fantastic-Trust770 on

      My question is, what was the mechanism and purpose of institutions and large corporations actively participating in the alienation of the majority by foisting radical leftism upon the masses?

      Was that just a deliberate subversion tactic orchestrated by right wing power players embedded in these positions of power?

    2. Past_Shirt_2516 on

      That pic is funny. Yeah, I didn’t agree with him either but was kinda mad about his death. I feel bad for his wife, but there is something weird with the way she speaks, like a bad actress. I was getting Kimberly guilfoyle vibes from her speech the other day. Maybe that’s just how people talk now, idk. I don’t have any thoughts on parents other than rich connected people have rich connected children, you know.

    3. Weird if you look up the structure of the free masons he would be 12⁰

      Also didn’t Trump or someone call charlie a m”aster builder”?

      “In Freemasonry, a “master builder” is a symbolic role, not a rank, representing a Master Mason who guides and men-
      tors others in building their
      moral character and contributing to the fraternity’s goals.”

    Leave A Reply