I was re-reading this article about a 9/11 volunteer rescuer hero here

    https://www.reviewjournal.com/local/local-las-vegas/911-memories-fresh-for-las-vegas-man-who-worked-at-ground-zero/

    And was struck by this photo of molten steel and ground zero

    And remembering my steel melting chart from welding school, also shown, where
    You can clearly see the temperature of some of those spots is well over 2200 degrees Fahrenheit, AND that the photo is allegedly dated for October 30th!!! Over a month after the attacks is unbelievable

    But the date makes perfect sense when backed up with this usgs satellite temperature survey post 9/11

    https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/

    Then this made me laugh it's so crazy, also in that article above is a picture of ground zero. building 7, the demolition that makes absolutely no sense at all, was call "the Salomon building" which i had never heard. It was called this because the "salomon brothers, inc." Were headquartered there. A giant jewish multinational investment bank.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salomon_Brothers

    The Salomon brothers were direct descendants of "Haym Salomon" a Jewish polish financier that was one of the main private contributors to the continental congress.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haym_Salomon

    He was credited with providing his last few dollars to fund the final battle of Yorktown, when the continental army was on the brink of collapse from bankruptcy. which ended up being the closing victory of the American revolution.

    BAD NEWS THOUGH! America DIDN'T pay him back…. he and his family died broke allegedly. And they apparently took it personally.

    The Salomon brothers were the first ones to create and sell Mortgage Backed Securities in the 1980's, essentially creating the 2007 financial meltdown, while also putting american residential realestate in their and wall street's cross hairs. Basically destroying the real-estate market that we have today.

    FUCK THE SALOMON BROTHERS

    Posted by Retardedmtt

    4 Comments

    1. Emergency_Accident36 on

      Idk you see the steel pouring out of the building like a foundary what more is there to say? Thermite for sure

    2. Elegant-Astronaut636 on

      Calling out bravo 7 read description for summary.

      Video Summary by Gemini: This video is a documentary titled “9/11 – CALLING OUT Bravo 7 – Documentary 2020” by the channel Kitzer 9/11 Archives. The film’s main purpose is to challenge the official explanation provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7) on September 11, 2001. The documentary argues that the collapse of WTC 7 could not have been caused solely by fire and strongly suggests the building was brought down by controlled demolition, citing the following key points and evidence:

      1. ⁠The “Free Fall” Evidence The documentary’s central argument revolves around the fact that the building descended in a period of “free fall” (gravitational acceleration) [01:01:05].

      • ⁠WTC 7 dropped for over 2 seconds, falling more than 100 feet (the equivalent of about eight stories) with virtually no resistance [01:01:05].
      • ⁠The video argues that for this to happen, the building’s entire structural integrity, including the 40,000 tons of structural steel, must have been removed simultaneously and instantaneously, a feat physically impossible from normal office fires [01:01:48].
      • ⁠An analysis of the roofline’s acceleration by a physics teacher, David Chandler, confirmed the period of free fall, which NIST later reluctantly acknowledged [01:01:47].

      1. ⁠Failure of Fire-Induced Collapse Theory The film dismisses the NIST conclusion that fire and thermal expansion caused the collapse [01:05:12]:

      • ⁠WTC 7 was a modern, steel-framed, fire-protected structure with reinforced concrete floors, built to withstand fire [01:17:14].
      • ⁠Historically, other high-rise fires of similar or greater severity (such as the MGM Grand or One Meridian Plaza) have never caused a complete structural collapse [01:08:05].
      • ⁠The fires in WTC 7 were limited, localized, and only able to survive for 20 to 30 minutes in any single spot due to restricted fuel [01:30:00].
      • ⁠A 2019 structural re-evaluation by the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF), featured in the film, concluded that fire could not have caused the weakening or displacement necessary for the collapse, and that the observed failure required the “near simultaneous failure of all columns” [01:58:31].

      1. ⁠Foreknowledge and Evacuation The documentary highlights evidence suggesting WTC 7’s collapse was anticipated by officials:

      • ⁠Multiple media outlets and oral histories from firefighters indicated WTC 7 was expected to collapse hours in advance [01:40:04].
      • ⁠Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani admitted he was warned the World Trade Center was “going to collapse” [01:42:04].
      • ⁠Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder of WTC 7, stated in an interview that he told the fire department to “pull it”—a term commonly used in controlled demolition, not firefighting [01:43:56].

      1. ⁠Flawed Investigation and Destruction of Evidence The film heavily criticizes the investigation by NIST for violating national fire investigation standards:

      • ⁠The majority of the evidence (1.5 million tons of steel wreckage) was quickly removed from the crime scene and sold as scrap, preventing a proper forensic investigation [01:09:32].
      • ⁠The investigators refused to test for explosives or thermite residue, despite reports from over 150 first responders of explosions, and the discovery of sulfidation and inexplicably sharp-edged holes in the steel [01:10:50]. The film concludes by demanding a new, impartial Federal Grand Jury investigation into the events of 9/11.

    3. ImpromptuHooloovoo on

      To say I’ve done a lot of reading and researching about 9/11 is an understatement, and this is the first I’ve heard about this–ty for your research and this post.

    Leave A Reply