The bill that passed today was acshully a means to give pinkie Bondi full authority to redact data if it’s a “matter of national sickoority”

As a leftist, until context is provided as to what’s contained in these emails of public importance, what their pertinence is, why they are relevant, what conclusions may be derived from such a release, what emails were of importance in any investigations, what they believe the intent or purpose of said emails being written by whoever is believed to write them, and what context they provide to any investigation of public concern these emails are largely a useless heap.

Whether or not some of the information has been provided I do not know. Given that in my decades of attempting to locate condensed sources of information that appears to reliably be fact and inquire about sources of information not be aware of, all recent attempts to locate sources of strictly literal and non-hyperbolic information streams have been fruitless. Mind you, this includes many thousands of hours of attempting to locate even but one – but even when you find a promising lead where they may be publishing this literal and non-hyperbolic information, you eventually run across some blatant falsehoods that render it completely unreliable.

Further, despite efforts across several channels known to be used to convey information, despite my inquiries I have also never been notified as to which channels they communicate strictly facts and provide relevant public notices to the public.

So, then it means our existing level of national security allows elite human trafficking, and that can’t be compromised?

…You really have to think backwards to make doublespeak make sense, but it is basically saying our national security level is low if anything Epstein was doing needs to be redacted, but also why is Epstein connected to national security in the first place.