The fairly milquetoast video that drew Trump’s outrage featured Senators Mark Kelly and Elissa Slotkin, and Representatives Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander, and Chrissy Houlahan—all former military or intelligence veterans.

“This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens. Like us, you all swore an oath to protect and defend this Constitution. Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home,” the Democrats said. “Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders.”

 Earlier this year

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2025/02/24/people-are-very-scared-trump-administration-purge-of-jag-officers-raises-legal-ethical-fears.html

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5162069-pentagon-officers-fired/

Posted by One-Incident3208

4 Comments

  1. Calling for the execution of people who tell the military to follow the law and defend the constitution is not the flex that Trump thinks it is.

  2. OpenImagination9 on

    I don’t know how it is now, but when I joined you swore an oath to defend the constitution.

  3. what those death threats are

    as far is i understand

    they are threatening or inciting violence

    while

    we have allready learnt how trump prefers to “unalive” to use his words people who travel on boats in international waters instead of following the usual procedure to stop them, take their drugs away from them and bring them before court where they might get a mild sentence if they were for example doing such smuggling tours for the first time

    80 people travelling on board of such ships what might have or have not transported drugs became victim of the supreme murderer in chief of usa intimidation urges what of course also make everyone in the military passing down those premeditated murder orders and enacting on them complicit

    those people in boats were not doing any agression, they were not attacking anyone

    because transporting drugs is not an agression itself

    its the buyer who is responsible to buy or not something of unknown quality in a shady street corner what might have the consequence of dying from the consumption of such substances

    also worth noting how there was someone with the united nations who recently called those murders out as “extrajudical killings” and unacceptable behaviour in international waters

    and even after that

    the “unaliving” of people on boats continued

    ————–

    https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/01/23/464129029/donald-trump-i-could-shoot-somebody-and-i-wouldnt-lose-any-voters

    Donald Trump: ‘I Could … Shoot Somebody, And I Wouldn’t Lose Any Voters’
    January 23, 2016

Leave A Reply