To them we’re all equal both in birth and in life (regardless of decisions,) they don’t see a pyramid structure where there’s a peak and a lower-most they envision a consistent brick wall where a brick is just a brick. The idea of one brick being the peak of something bad goes against their belief system. They’ll hate *the right* and they’ll hate whomever is in charge of it, but when they see someone land in court for harming people ***again and again and again and again and again*** they’ll say he’s misunderstood.
They hate the right because we’re individualists instead of collectivists – the difference between the two sides in itself.
They want us treated equally at the finish line, no matter how far they have to distort *the starting line* to achieve that. The way we prefer to treat people equally at the starting line means their finishing positions will all be wildly different.
codifier on
Some poor writing here.
First, the driveby shooting charges came after he was released from the SWAT incident. They had yet to tie him to the incident.
>Herrera was subsequently charged with evading arrest or detention, unlawful carrying of weapons, disorderly conduct, and tampering or fabricating with evidence, according to the outlet.
>Despite the charges, court records obtained by FOX 7 indicate Herrera was released from jail just two days after his standoff with SWAT.
How was he released? Did they just ROR him or did he make bail? What was the bond if he made it? The above charges aren’t nothing but theyre not serious enough without a history of bail jumping to deny bail, so did he get bail? IANAL but I know at least some jurisdictions have a formula where x crime = y bail unless youre shown to be a flight risk. Did the DA make that argument? That information isnt shared.
He’s obviously not a good person and a threat to society especially after they tied him to random shootings but the journalism isnt great.
>his total combined bond amount set at $409,500.
They at least included the second go around of bail conditions. Personally I dont think bail should have even been offered. He scrapes up 40k and he’s back on the streets.
unlock0 on
My brain filled in Brandon Herrera for a second there.
comfortable711 on
Gun control advocates are so busy passing anti-gun laws and suing gun makers, they forget the real problem are the activist judges that keep putting shooters back on the streets.
4 Comments
>A [Texas repeat offender](https://www.foxnews.com/category/us/us-regions/southwest/texas) is back behind bars following his alleged involvement in three separate shootings spanning the course of just one month.
When you lock up the worst offenders, ***THE STREETS GET SAFER***.
One fundamental difference between left and right is that the left does not believe the Pareto Principle is real, or *should be.*
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle)
[https://betterexplained.com/articles/understanding-the-pareto-principle-the-8020-rule/](https://betterexplained.com/articles/understanding-the-pareto-principle-the-8020-rule/)
[https://asana.com/resources/pareto-principle-80-20-rule](https://asana.com/resources/pareto-principle-80-20-rule)
To them we’re all equal both in birth and in life (regardless of decisions,) they don’t see a pyramid structure where there’s a peak and a lower-most they envision a consistent brick wall where a brick is just a brick. The idea of one brick being the peak of something bad goes against their belief system. They’ll hate *the right* and they’ll hate whomever is in charge of it, but when they see someone land in court for harming people ***again and again and again and again and again*** they’ll say he’s misunderstood.
They hate the right because we’re individualists instead of collectivists – the difference between the two sides in itself.
They want us treated equally at the finish line, no matter how far they have to distort *the starting line* to achieve that. The way we prefer to treat people equally at the starting line means their finishing positions will all be wildly different.
Some poor writing here.
First, the driveby shooting charges came after he was released from the SWAT incident. They had yet to tie him to the incident.
>Herrera was subsequently charged with evading arrest or detention, unlawful carrying of weapons, disorderly conduct, and tampering or fabricating with evidence, according to the outlet.
>Despite the charges, court records obtained by FOX 7 indicate Herrera was released from jail just two days after his standoff with SWAT.
How was he released? Did they just ROR him or did he make bail? What was the bond if he made it? The above charges aren’t nothing but theyre not serious enough without a history of bail jumping to deny bail, so did he get bail? IANAL but I know at least some jurisdictions have a formula where x crime = y bail unless youre shown to be a flight risk. Did the DA make that argument? That information isnt shared.
He’s obviously not a good person and a threat to society especially after they tied him to random shootings but the journalism isnt great.
>his total combined bond amount set at $409,500.
They at least included the second go around of bail conditions. Personally I dont think bail should have even been offered. He scrapes up 40k and he’s back on the streets.
My brain filled in Brandon Herrera for a second there.
Gun control advocates are so busy passing anti-gun laws and suing gun makers, they forget the real problem are the activist judges that keep putting shooters back on the streets.